| Revision as of 01:19, 11 January 2007 editKafziel (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users24,921 edits afd withdrawn← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:14, 16 January 2007 edit undoRumpelstiltskin223 (talk | contribs)3,160 edits some expansion is needed here.Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{expand}} | |||
| '''Indophobia''' is essentially the opposite of ]: It often refers as antipathy towards of ]n concepts, in particular ], especially in the ]. | '''Indophobia''' is essentially the opposite of ]: It often refers as antipathy towards of ]n concepts, in particular ], especially in the ]. It can also extend to include phobias and prejudices against other people from the Indian Subcontinent, such as ]s and ]s. | ||
| ==Historical Indophobia== | |||
| Trautmann (1997) argues that British Indophobia was constructed by ] and ] and its chief architects were ] and ]. | Trautmann (1997) argues that British Indophobia was constructed by ] and ] and its chief architects were ] and ]. | ||
| Line 6: | Line 8: | ||
| {{cquote|Hindustan is a place of little charm. There is no beauty in its people, no graceful social intercourse, no poetic talent or understanding, no etiquette, nobility or manliness. The arts and crafts have no harmony or symmetry. There are no good horses, meat, grapes, melons or other fruit. There is no ice, cold water, good food or bread in the markets. There are no baths and no madrasas. There are no candles, torches or candlesticks"<ref>''The Baburnama'' Ed. & Trans. Wheeler M. Thackston (New York) 2002 p352 </ref>.}} | {{cquote|Hindustan is a place of little charm. There is no beauty in its people, no graceful social intercourse, no poetic talent or understanding, no etiquette, nobility or manliness. The arts and crafts have no harmony or symmetry. There are no good horses, meat, grapes, melons or other fruit. There is no ice, cold water, good food or bread in the markets. There are no baths and no madrasas. There are no candles, torches or candlesticks"<ref>''The Baburnama'' Ed. & Trans. Wheeler M. Thackston (New York) 2002 p352 </ref>.}} | ||
| ==Academic Indophobia== | |||
| ==Contemporary Societal Indophobia== | |||
| Contemporary Indophobia has risen in the western world, particularly the ], on account of the rise of the ] community and the increase in ] of ] jobs to India by American multinational corporations. Societal prejudices against South Asians in the west manifest through isolated instances of intimidation and harrassment, such as the case of the ] street gang. | |||
| Other countries with persistent prejudice against Indian Nationals include ], on account of the Indo-Pakistan rivalry since the ]. Prejudices against Pakistani nationals exist in some spheres of Indian society as well. | |||
| With the rise of ] and, following the ], Indian and Pakistani nationals in the United States, frequently misidentified as middle-easterners, have become collateral victims of ]. | |||
| Line 14: | Line 26: | ||
| * ] | * ] | ||
| ⚫ | {{India-hist-stub|Indophobia}} | ||
| == References == | == References == | ||
| Line 30: | Line 41: | ||
| * | * | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| ⚫ | {{India-hist-stub|Indophobia}} | ||
Revision as of 04:14, 16 January 2007
Indophobia is essentially the opposite of Indomania: It often refers as antipathy towards of Indian concepts, in particular Hindu culture, especially in the Western world. It can also extend to include phobias and prejudices against other people from the Indian Subcontinent, such as Pakistanis and Bangladeshis.
Historical Indophobia
Trautmann (1997) argues that British Indophobia was constructed by Evangelicalism and Utilitarianism and its chief architects were Charles Grant and James Mill.
The words of first Mughal emperor Babur which he wrote in the Bāburnāma mirror the despise with which India and its people were seen by others:
Hindustan is a place of little charm. There is no beauty in its people, no graceful social intercourse, no poetic talent or understanding, no etiquette, nobility or manliness. The arts and crafts have no harmony or symmetry. There are no good horses, meat, grapes, melons or other fruit. There is no ice, cold water, good food or bread in the markets. There are no baths and no madrasas. There are no candles, torches or candlesticks".
Academic Indophobia
Contemporary Societal Indophobia
Contemporary Indophobia has risen in the western world, particularly the United States, on account of the rise of the Indian American community and the increase in offshoring of white-collar jobs to India by American multinational corporations. Societal prejudices against South Asians in the west manifest through isolated instances of intimidation and harrassment, such as the case of the Dotbusters street gang.
Other countries with persistent prejudice against Indian Nationals include Pakistan, on account of the Indo-Pakistan rivalry since the Partition of India. Prejudices against Pakistani nationals exist in some spheres of Indian society as well.
With the rise of Islamic terrorism and, following the September 11, 2001 attacks, Indian and Pakistani nationals in the United States, frequently misidentified as middle-easterners, have become collateral victims of anti-Arabism.
See also
References
- Thomas R. Trautmann, Aryans and British India, University of California Press (1997), ISBN 0-520-20546-4, chapter 4: British Indophobia
- Idi Amin & indophobia:
  | This Indian history-related article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |
- The Baburnama Ed. & Trans. Wheeler M. Thackston (New York) 2002 p352