| Revision as of 00:14, 4 March 2021 view sourceClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,381,601 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Supreme Deliciousness/Archives/2021/February. (BOT)← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:48, 4 March 2021 view source ClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,381,601 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Supreme Deliciousness/Archives/2021/February. (BOT)Next edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| |box-advert=yes | |box-advert=yes | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| == ] notification == | |||
| You are involved in a recently-filed request for clarification or amendment from the Arbitration Committee. Please review the request at ] and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the ] may be of use. | |||
| Thanks,<!-- Template:Arbitration CA notice --> ] (]) 14:57, 25 February 2021 (UTC) | |||
| *By the way, was an entirely acceptable edit under ], though erring on the side of caution in the case of a topic ban is always wise. --] (]) 15:00, 25 February 2021 (UTC) | |||
| *Moved to ]. I apologize for the confusion. --] (]) 17:20, 25 February 2021 (UTC) | |||
| == Arbitration motion regarding ''Kurds and Kurdistan'' == | == Arbitration motion regarding ''Kurds and Kurdistan'' == | ||
Revision as of 22:48, 4 March 2021
/
Arbitration motion regarding Kurds and Kurdistan
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
The phrase "articles related to" in the topic bans for GPinkerton, Thepharoah17, عمرو بن كلثوم, and Supreme Deliciousness are struck, to clarify that the bans are not limited to article-space.
For the Arbitration Committee, GeneralNotability (talk) 02:44, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- Discuss this at: Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Arbitration motion regarding Kurds and Kurdistan
Your ACN post
I have removed your thread from WT:ACN, as it is in breach of your topic ban. ACN is not the place to re-litigate the Arbitration case, nor are you allowed to make an appeal of your topic ban for at a minimum of 12 months. Since this is a good-faith mistake I will not be taking any administrative action, but please do your best in the future to stay away from the topics imposed by your sanction, even if you strongly disagree with them. Primefac (talk) 00:27, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
- Primefac, I received a message from arbcom above: that said that I can discuss the case at WT:ACN, so how can it be a breach of my topic ban when you tell me I can discuss it there? --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 00:30, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
- Replied at my talk (permalink). Primefac (talk) 00:36, 28 February 2021 (UTC)