| Revision as of 13:15, 16 January 2007 view sourceUncle G (talk | contribs)Administrators52,482 edits Restored sourced analysis. Discussion on talk page didn't come to this conclusion.← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:47, 16 January 2007 view source Uncle G (talk | contribs)Administrators52,482 edits →Analysis: Expanded from Egan.Next edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| ]<ref>{{cite book|author=David Crystal|publisher=Cambridge University Press|date=2001|id=ISBN 0-521-80212-1|title=Language and the Internet|date=]|pages=34}}</ref> notes that use of "LOL" is not necessarily genuine, posing the rhetorical question "how many people are actually 'laughing out loud' when they send LOL?". | ]<ref>{{cite book|author=David Crystal|publisher=Cambridge University Press|date=2001|id=ISBN 0-521-80212-1|title=Language and the Internet|date=]|pages=34}}</ref> notes that use of "LOL" is not necessarily genuine, posing the rhetorical question "how many people are actually 'laughing out loud' when they send LOL?". | ||
| Victoria Clarke, in her analysis of telnet talkers,<ref>{{cite web|title=Internet English: an analysis of the variety of language used on Telnet talkers|author=Victoria Clarke|date=]|url=http://www.american.edu/lfs/tesol/2003%20Paper--Lg%20of%20the%20Internet.pdf|format=PDF}}</ref> states that capitalization is important when people write "LOL", and that "a user who types ''LOL'' may well be laughing louder than one who types ''lol''", and opines that "these standard expressions of laughter are losing force through overuse". | Victoria Clarke, in her analysis of telnet talkers,<ref>{{cite web|title=Internet English: an analysis of the variety of language used on Telnet talkers|author=Victoria Clarke|date=]|url=http://www.american.edu/lfs/tesol/2003%20Paper--Lg%20of%20the%20Internet.pdf|format=PDF}}</ref> states that capitalization is important when people write "LOL", and that "a user who types ''LOL'' may well be laughing louder than one who types ''lol''", and opines that "these standard expressions of laughter are losing force through overuse". Egan<ref>{{cite book|title=Email Etiquette|author=Michael Egan|publisher=Cool Publications Ltd|id=ISBN 1844811182|pages=57}}</ref> describes "LOL", "ROTFL", and other initialisms as helpful as long as they are not overused. | ||
| In the case of teenagers who have grown up with e-mail and text-messaging, the abbreviation "lol" has become so commonplace as to lose all meaning. It often serves merely as a place-holder, punctuating sentences and comments much as the words "like" and "um" do for ].{{fact}} Many people also tend to use this "lol" as a means of ending sentences or when they have nothing else to say.{{fact}} It has been used so much by some people that they will in fact pronounce "LOL" in verbal communication in place of laughing and other short phrases.{{fact}} | In the case of teenagers who have grown up with e-mail and text-messaging, the abbreviation "lol" has become so commonplace as to lose all meaning. It often serves merely as a place-holder, punctuating sentences and comments much as the words "like" and "um" do for ].{{fact}} Many people also tend to use this "lol" as a means of ending sentences or when they have nothing else to say.{{fact}} It has been used so much by some people that they will in fact pronounce "LOL" in verbal communication in place of laughing and other short phrases.{{fact}} | ||
Revision as of 13:47, 16 January 2007
| An editor has nominated this article for deletion. You are welcome to participate in the deletion discussion, which will decide whether or not to retain it.Feel free to improve the article, but do not remove this notice before the discussion is closed. For more information, see the guide to deletion. Find sources: "LOL" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR%5B%5BWikipedia%3AArticles+for+deletion%2FLOL%5D%5DAFD |
LOL (also written lol or lawl) is an abbreviation for "laugh out loud", "laughing out loud", or very rarely "lots of laughter", "lots of laughs" or "laugh online". " LOL is a common element of Internet slang used, historically, on Usenet. It is similar to the acronyms "lmao" (laughing my ass/arse off), "rofl" (rolling on the floor laughing), and "roflmao" (a combination of the two), which are used to communicate a higher degree of amusement. LOL can be pronounced phonetically as "LOLL" or "LAWL." Evidence of this phrase has been located as far back as a Usenet posting on January 17, 1990.
The use of LOL to express laughter is unrelated to other uses of the abbreviation, many of which, such as "lots of love", predate the Internet.
Analysis
Many people are critical of "LOL" and its related acronyms and there is widespread controversy over their use.
Lacetti, professor of humanities at Stevens Institute of Technology, and Molsk in their essay entitled The Lost Art of Writing predict reduced chances of employment for students who use such acronyms, stating that "Unfortunately for these students, their bosses will not be 'lol' when they read a report that lacks proper punctuation and grammar, has numerous misspellings, various made-up words, and silly acronyms."
David Crystal notes that use of "LOL" is not necessarily genuine, posing the rhetorical question "how many people are actually 'laughing out loud' when they send LOL?".
Victoria Clarke, in her analysis of telnet talkers, states that capitalization is important when people write "LOL", and that "a user who types LOL may well be laughing louder than one who types lol", and opines that "these standard expressions of laughter are losing force through overuse". Egan describes "LOL", "ROTFL", and other initialisms as helpful as long as they are not overused.
In the case of teenagers who have grown up with e-mail and text-messaging, the abbreviation "lol" has become so commonplace as to lose all meaning. It often serves merely as a place-holder, punctuating sentences and comments much as the words "like" and "um" do for Generation X. Many people also tend to use this "lol" as a means of ending sentences or when they have nothing else to say. It has been used so much by some people that they will in fact pronounce "LOL" in verbal communication in place of laughing and other short phrases.
Variations on the theme
Despite it being an English acronym, it is often used by non-English speakers as-is, even in other scripts (eg. Template:Lang-ar, Hebrew: לול, Cyrillic: лол). It can also be used in Interlingua.
Translations in widespread use
Most of these abbreviations are usually found in lowercase.
- lal or lawl — can refer to either a pseudo-pronunciation of LOL, or the German translation (although most German speakers use "LOL"). Saying "lawl" is sometimes meant in mockery of those who use the term LOL, and not meant as serious usage.
- ｗ — used commonly in 2channel, a Japanese equivalent of the acronym.
- lolz — plural form occasionally used in place of "LOL".
- mdr — French version of the expression "LOL", meaning "mort de rire". Roughly translated, it means "dead from laughing".
Other languages
Lol is a Dutch word (not an acronym), which, conveniently, means 'fun' ('lollig' means funny).
LOL in Sinhalese refers to a tropical cherry.
References
- Russ Armadillo Coffman (1990-01-17). "smilies collection". Newsgroup: rec.humor. Retrieved 2006-12-22.
{{cite newsgroup}}: Check date values in:|date=(help) - Silvio Lacetti and Scott Molsk (2003-09-06). "Cost of poor writing no laughing matter". Atlanta Journal-Constitution.
{{cite news}}: Check date values in:|date=(help) - "Article co-authored by Stevens professor and student garners nationwide attention from business, academia" (Press release). Stevens Institute of Technology. 2003-10-22.
{{cite press release}}: Check date values in:|date=(help) - David Crystal (2001-09-20). Language and the Internet. Cambridge University Press. p. 34. ISBN 0-521-80212-1.
{{cite book}}: Check date values in:|date=(help) - Victoria Clarke (2002-01-30). "Internet English: an analysis of the variety of language used on Telnet talkers" (PDF).
{{cite web}}: Check date values in:|date=(help) - Michael Egan. Email Etiquette. Cool Publications Ltd. p. 57. ISBN 1844811182.