| Revision as of 14:35, 19 January 2007 editPenwhale (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users7,574 editsm rv but -{{welcome}}← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:36, 19 January 2007 edit undo163.167.129.124 (talk) ←Blanked the pageNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==]== | |||
| Hi! Thank you for your edits to the ]. Do you think you could provide a reference for the motto you listed for Italy? A hardly provides any results and it isn't listed at ] or ]. It is Misplaced Pages policy that all statements be backed up by ]. Thanks, ]<sup>]</sup> 11:54, 17 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Wales == | |||
| Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Wales|, as you are doing in ]}}. If you continue, you may be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for ], even if they do not technically violate the ]. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.<!-- Template:3RR -->/] 14:34, 17 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I fully support this comment. The practice of doing a double edit to prevent easy reversion is also devious--] 15:33, 17 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :''moved from ]'' | |||
| Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Wales. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. What are your sources exactly as you do not state any? | |||
| ] 14:50, 17 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :You what? Count them: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Wales&curid=69894&action=history == 1 revert. Please stop putting the personal motto of the Prince of Wales as a motto of the ''country''. Thanks/] 15:10, 17 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| AND your sources are..? As I mentioned above you do not cite any. Aside from corrections in layout, I edited the page twice and you have changed it back twice. I find your tone extremely unpleasant by the way. | |||
| ] 15:22, 17 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :No, count again - one revert. If indeed I had made two then a ] notice is still inappropriate and, guess what, that might account for my tone. Sources are not the issue — you are attempting to put the '''personal motto''' of an individual (the ]) down as the motto '''of a country''' (])... See the big difference? Thanks/] 15:25, 17 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| You have undone my edit (twice) on two different pages and then threatened to block me from editing with the above "notice." Your unpleasant manner started before my reply in which I copied the message you originally sent me. | |||
| ] 15:33, 17 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I posted the 3RR warning on your talk page because it was appropriate - you have re-added that motto numerous times, see http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Wales&curid=69894&action=history (three times, but using many edits - remember to use the preview button). ] is an official policy on the English Misplaced Pages, '''make that edit to Wales again and you will be blocked'''. It is important to discuss on an article talk page and gain ] for controversial edits; constantly re-adding edits is not the way to do things. I reverted you '''once''' on Wales, the other reverts were by other editors. I cannot find any other article that I have reverted you on. Thanks/] 16:28, 17 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ] You have removed several ] from your user or user talk page. These warnings are not put on your talk page to annoy you; they were placed here because other editors have noticed an issue with your behaviour that may require improvement. They are a method of communication and user talk pages stand as a record of communication with you. If you do not believe the warning was valid or have a question about improving your behaviour you can respond here or visit the ]. If your talk page is becoming long, you can archive it in accordance with the guidelines laid out here ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Removewarn (Warning removal caution) Based on wording originally by User:Pilotguy --> | |||
| :''moved from ], please reply here'' | |||
| :Numerous times = twice, in both instances immediately reverted by you. Now I find your tone threatening and bullying. I am a new user and will make a formal complaint about this to an Administrator! ] 16:52, 17 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::As a new user might I recommend that spend some time having a read through some of the links that were posted at the top our your talk page. You seem to have a problem remembering what edits you have made to the Wales article - the page history is clear on the number of edits/reverts both yourself and I have made. I am a Misplaced Pages administrator, but of course you are free to ask the advice of another (as mentioned in the paragraph above which was added by another editor). Thanks/] 17:09, 17 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Your edits to ] and ] == | |||
| Please do not add nonsense to Misplaced Pages{{#if:{{{1|}}}|, as you did to ]}}. It is considered ]. If you would like to experiment, use the ]. Thank you. <!-- Template:Test2 (second level warning) --> --] 17:02, 17 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Please stop removing content from your talk page == | |||
| ] You have removed several ] from your user or user talk page. These warnings are not put on your talk page to annoy you; they were placed here because other editors have noticed an issue with your behaviour that may require improvement. They are a method of communication and user talk pages stand as a record of communication with you. If you do not believe the warning was valid or have a question about improving your behaviour you can respond here or visit the ]. If your talk page is becoming long, you can archive it in accordance with the guidelines laid out here ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Removewarn (Warning removal caution) Based on wording originally by User:Pilotguy --> ]<sup>]</sup> 14:12, 19 January 2007 (UTC) | |||