Misplaced Pages

Talk:The Godfather: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:22, 16 April 2021 editFilmgoer (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users59,510 edits Hatnote← Previous edit Revision as of 18:23, 16 April 2021 edit undoPraxidicae (talk | contribs)Edit filter helpers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers169,003 edits HatnoteNext edit →
Line 79: Line 79:


The current hatnote (''This article is about the 1972 film. For the original novel on which the film is based, see ]. For the male godparent in many Christian traditions, see ].''), has an issue in the last part. ] sends a reader to a disambiguation page, and so the hatnote should say just that (... for other uses, see ].) However, even after ] agreed that the small correction was helpful, ] began reverting my edits by calling me "boring" and saying that the current version had been there for a long time. After Praxidicae reverted Gareth for being "silly", Gareth continued to revert everyone's edits. Now, the question is, which hatnote works better? ''']''' ] 18:21, 16 April 2021 (UTC) The current hatnote (''This article is about the 1972 film. For the original novel on which the film is based, see ]. For the male godparent in many Christian traditions, see ].''), has an issue in the last part. ] sends a reader to a disambiguation page, and so the hatnote should say just that (... for other uses, see ].) However, even after ] agreed that the small correction was helpful, ] began reverting my edits by calling me "boring" and saying that the current version had been there for a long time. After Praxidicae reverted Gareth for being "silly", Gareth continued to revert everyone's edits. Now, the question is, which hatnote works better? ''']''' ] 18:21, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
:Point of clarification, I did not call Gareth silly. I said the note was silly, further, you both edit warred. ] 18:23, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:23, 16 April 2021

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Godfather article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 3 months 

Template:Vital article

Good articleThe Godfather has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 16, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
September 3, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
June 23, 2006Good article nomineeNot listed
March 13, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
April 10, 2020Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article
The Godfather received a peer review by Misplaced Pages editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconFilm: Core / American
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
Taskforce icon
This article is on the project's core list.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
WikiProject iconCrime and Criminal Biography: Organized crime
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Organized crime task force.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconUnited States: Cinema Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force (assessed as High-importance).
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconLibrary of Congress Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Library of Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Library of Congress on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Library of CongressWikipedia:WikiProject Library of CongressTemplate:WikiProject Library of CongressLibrary of Congress
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconNew York City Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconSicily Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Sicily, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sicily on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SicilyWikipedia:WikiProject SicilyTemplate:WikiProject SicilySicily
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
A fact from this article was featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the On this day section on March 15, 2010, March 15, 2011, March 15, 2014, and March 15, 2017.


Moe Greene

Anyone have/find sources as to why Alex Rocco as Moe Greene was not credited in the end credits of the film? Vaselineeeeeeee 20:36, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

GA Review

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:The Godfather/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Adamstom.97 (talk · contribs) 10:14, 6 April 2020 (UTC)


This is a very noteworthy film, hopefully the Misplaced Pages article can live up to that! I'll take some time to give this a full review and come back with some thoughts in the coming days. - adamstom97 (talk) 10:14, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

I believe that this article is really great and meets all the criteria for GA, it's well sourced and written, broad in coverage, and neutral. I am happy to promote it, but I did have a couple minor quibbles that might as well be discussed before I close the review.

  • The "Video game" subsection seems out-of-place in the "Release" section since it isn't really to do with the release of the film and in my opinion should not be given the amount of weight that having it there is giving it. I think it would make sense to move this subsection into the "Representation in other media" section.
  • There are two bulleted lists below the accolades table but only one of them has a subheading explaining what is being listed. I think it would help for the other one to have its own subheading as well.

Once you have responded to those we can move along with the review. - adamstom97 (talk) 00:01, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the fast work responding above. To reiterate, I have had a thorough read of this article and it clearly meets the GA criteria. I am happy to pass this review. Congratulations! - adamstom97 (talk) 00:36, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

John Cazale

John Cazale is not credited with the role of Fredo Corleone on this page

He is if you read The Godfather#Cast. MarnetteD|Talk 01:05, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Disambig

Gareth Griffith-Jones and Some Dude From North Carolina you're both being disruptive and need to hash it out here. Stop reverting to your preferred version. TAXIDICAE💰 18:20, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Hatnote

The current hatnote (This article is about the 1972 film. For the original novel on which the film is based, see The Godfather (novel). For the male godparent in many Christian traditions, see Godfather.), has an issue in the last part. Godfather sends a reader to a disambiguation page, and so the hatnote should say just that (... for other uses, see Godfather.) However, even after User:Praxidicae agreed that the small correction was helpful, User:Gareth Griffith-Jones began reverting my edits by calling me "boring" and saying that the current version had been there for a long time. After Praxidicae reverted Gareth for being "silly", Gareth continued to revert everyone's edits. Now, the question is, which hatnote works better? Some Dude From North Carolina 18:21, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Point of clarification, I did not call Gareth silly. I said the note was silly, further, you both edit warred. TAXIDICAE💰 18:23, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Categories: