| Revision as of 22:09, 19 January 2007 editMackan79 (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers7,363 editsm →Merging Religious Antisemitism with Anti-Judaism← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:01, 20 January 2007 edit undoJustas Jonas (talk | contribs)203 edits →Martin Luther content rich info boxNext edit → | ||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
| Are we back to an "old" info box for a reason? This was discussed (argued) at length on the article's talk page. Only one user spoke up there as not wanting it, and it was not you ... I'm so confused. Thanks for your reply. ] 20:04, 19 January 2007 (UTC) | Are we back to an "old" info box for a reason? This was discussed (argued) at length on the article's talk page. Only one user spoke up there as not wanting it, and it was not you ... I'm so confused. Thanks for your reply. ] 20:04, 19 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ::::::Looks a lot better to me this way. I wish the picture could be better. Thank you Slim. ] 01:01, 20 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Merging Religious Antisemitism with Anti-Judaism== | ==Merging Religious Antisemitism with Anti-Judaism== | ||
Revision as of 01:01, 20 January 2007
Hi SlimVirginOk, so I think your behavior toward me is pretty lame. Nevertheless, I still don't see the benefit in fighting with you, although your personal attacks, etc, continue to be documented. I'm simply wondering, is there anything I can do to convince you that an honest dialogue with me is warranted? You seem to have concluded I'm some kind of crank, I have to assume, since you're unwilling to talk to me. I don't really know how to fix the problem. I tried to explain why I'm editing these articles on WP, though I guess you weren't impressed. In any case, I'm not vindictive, but I am stubborn, so you'll probably keep seeing me around; I'd ask that we simply try to act like adults, rather than fighting and fighting untill one or the other of us has a successful case for blocking the other, or whatever ultimately happens around here. Also: you may or may not have noticed, but I don't exactly pick the worst battles. Deep down, I think you know, for instance, that the research on Anti-Judaism, and that on religious antisemitism, differ. I also think you recognize that Anti-Judaism, as a subject, probably deserves its own page much more than "Religious Antisemitism," a subject on which I can't even find a book. I'm sure you have an argument for why they're the same, which I'd love to hear, but I think you also recognize the arguments the other way, no matter how ignorant you pretend Kendrick and I are. I think you've also seen that my edits on Folke Bernadotte aren't exactly outrageous, nor my suggestions on Zionism, nor my edits on Allegations of Israeli Apartheid. I'm not trying to insert POV material into WP. I'm simply trying to resolve some of the POV disputes on these contentious articles, which I find to be an interesting and worthy challenge, and something which I truly think would benefit everybody. I'm hoping eventually that will become clear enough, but I'm also hoping it could happen sooner rather than later. Best, Mackan79 22:29, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Gavin the ChosenNot clear if you're accepting comments - but you did invite questions on this one User:Gavin the Chosen - he has other non-functioning accounts, and the userpage seems to say he suffers from adhd. Can you supply a link on my talk that helps to explain this? Thanks.--Shtove 01:54, 18 January 2007 (UTC) User KazakhPol againHe now seems to be trying to change Misplaced Pages guides to suite his "call everyone terrorist" agenda, see: Misplaced Pages:Words_to_avoid Aaliyah Stevens 09:32, 18 January 2007 (UTC) Re: Baby sealJust to let you know, due to unforseen logistical difficulties, including what I can only describe as a redonkulous level of security at the New England Aquarium, I have been unable to carry out my earlier threat of clubbing a baby seal to death while repeatedly and loudly cursing your screen name. No doubt you consider this far out of character for me, but I have decided to try a different tack. In exchange for toning down you rhetorical dragging-my-name-though-the-sludge everytime we have a disagreement, I will, next time my cat has a litter, gladly Fed-ex you one (1) kitten. And if you are extra nice, I may even poke air holes in the box. Whadaya say? -- Kendrick7 00:29, 19 January 2007 (UTC) Martin Luther content rich info boxAre we back to an "old" info box for a reason? This was discussed (argued) at length on the article's talk page. Only one user spoke up there as not wanting it, and it was not you ... I'm so confused. Thanks for your reply. Keesiewonder 20:04, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Merging Religious Antisemitism with Anti-JudaismHi, just curious to get your take on re-merging Religious Antisemitism with Anti-Judaism, but under the title of Anti-Judaism. The issue is being discussed on Talk:Religious antisemitism currently. Thanks, Mackan79 22:06, 19 January 2007 (UTC) |