Revision as of 17:59, 28 April 2021 edit力 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers43,755 edits try to fix archiving← Previous edit |
Revision as of 06:35, 29 April 2021 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,302,381 editsm Archiving 12 discussion(s) to Talk:Social media use by Donald Trump/Archive 1) (botNext edit → |
Line 61: |
Line 61: |
|
* '''Approve''' deletionists are responsible of this situation. The proposal makes total sense. --] (]) 03:09, 9 January 2021 (UTC) |
|
* '''Approve''' deletionists are responsible of this situation. The proposal makes total sense. --] (]) 03:09, 9 January 2021 (UTC) |
|
* '''Support''' the most important topic here is Trump's use of Twitter. It might make sense to bundle the Facebook/etc. information with content on his appearances on Fox News, etc. ] (power~enwiki, ], ]) 17:57, 28 April 2021 (UTC) |
|
* '''Support''' the most important topic here is Trump's use of Twitter. It might make sense to bundle the Facebook/etc. information with content on his appearances on Fox News, etc. ] (power~enwiki, ], ]) 17:57, 28 April 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
== Comment by 145.53.114.244 == |
|
|
What has happened to Misplaced Pages. When exactly did Misplaced Pages pages become as loaded as certain far left news articles? I am deeply saddened by this turnover. Misplaced Pages used to be the figurehead of the internet, the manifestation of the fantastic dream that the internet would serve to promote free speech and the spread of knowledge. Can you recover, please? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 17:54, 29 October 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
:Misplaced Pages still is. We however don't promote stuff not covered by ]. ] ] <sup>|</sup> ] 15:15, 30 October 2020 (UTC) |
|
|
:Do you have any specific suggestions for how to improve the article's neutrality? ] (]) 04:24, 9 January 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
: In answer to your question "When exactly did Misplaced Pages pages become as loaded as certain far left news articles", the answer is around November. It was pretty good before then. Now it is filled with information from only one side, with no coverage of opposing viewpoints at all. For this reason it has become useless for me as a resource on subjects like this one. It's become polluted like our air by factories churning out smog and smoke. Really sad. It's a shame, it was really valuable. ] (]) 07:58, 9 January 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:: {{Reply to|Kenreader}} When describing controversial subjects, Misplaced Pages aims to provide balanced, impartial coverage of all notable viewpoints. Understand that this does not mean ], but a weighted balance proportional to each viewpoint's appearance in ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
:: If you have any ideas for how to improve this particular article, this is the page to discuss them. If you have any specific proposals on how to improve Misplaced Pages as a whole, try the ]. If you want to spread the word that Misplaced Pages is biased partisan garbage, maybe start a blog? ] (]) 16:57, 9 January 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== gab.com == |
|
|
|
|
|
Is this his official ] account: https://gab.com/realDonaldTrump ? If it is then this article should link to it. ] "is an English-language alt-tech social networking service". (In the days before mega-corporation/mainstream websites there were no "alt-tech" websites but just "websites".) --] (]) 10:13, 9 January 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Trump "quote" == |
|
|
|
|
|
Is the current "quoted" tweet necessary, and if so, is that the most representative tweet? I get that looking for new tweets may be a tad difficult now, but still. ] (]) 11:42, 9 January 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Tweet on article beginning == |
|
|
|
|
|
The tweet on the article's beginning is currently not visible. Please fix by linking to an archive of the tweet. Thanks! --] (]) 11:48, 9 January 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
:The {{tl|tweet}} template currently does not have this function. I've requested it be added.--<span style="text-shadow:#FFD700 0.2em 0.2em 0.2em">] ]</span> 12:06, 9 January 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Myspace? == |
|
|
|
|
|
Trump also supposedly has a Myspace account: https://myspace.com/donald_trump_offical. Not sure it's real. --<span style="text-shadow:#FFD700 0.2em 0.2em 0.2em">] ]</span> 12:12, 9 January 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Tweets published on @POTUS == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi ], thank you for your edit on the usage of @POTUS over the last day. However, you used Newsweek as a source, which is generally not reliable according to ]. I was able to find a Washington Post article to back up the first sentence of your edit, but unfortunately no reliable source for the second ({{tq|In these tweets, he complained about Twitter's ban and accused the social media platform, without evidence, of colluding in a conspiracy with the Democratic Party and "the Radical Left" to get him banned, while repeating the rhetoric that first got him banned from his main Twitter account}}). While I am not disputing that this may be true, I was wondering if you could help me find a ]-compliant source to back this claim up?--] (]) 15:57, 9 January 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
:I was able to find an article from US News, which is considered reliable, that clarifies the situation surrounding his circumventions . I would suggest changing the paragraph to this: |
|
|
:Trump tried to circumvent this ban by briefly making a series of tweets on the @POTUS Twitter account, but the posts were deleted within minutes of them being tweeted. Trump also tried to circumvent the ban by posting a statement on the @TeamTrump campaign Twitter account in which he complained about Twitter's ban and accused the social media platform, without evidence, of colluding in a conspiracy with the Democratic Party and "the Radical Left" to get him banned, while repeating the rhetoric that first got him banned from his main Twitter account. This account was also banned after the statement from Trump was posted. |
|
|
:] (]) 17:55, 9 January 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
::I slightly expanded the paragraph to reference the suspension of the official campaign handle with a reference to NPR.--] (]) 18:12, 9 January 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
:::I removed the unreliable newsweek source and replaced it with the reliable US News source. I also fixed the paragraph to say that Trump's without evidence claim was made on his campaign account and not the POTUS account. ] (]) 18:58, 9 January 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Does Twitter really "request" the removal of Tweets? == |
|
|
I changed the wording from "request" to "demand" in the section that talks about the temporary suspension of Mr Trump's Twitter account, because the fact is, when Twitter forces a user to delete certain tweets in order to have their account reinstated, it is inaccurate to describe such a thing as a "request". It is not "pov" (point of view, or mere opinion) to describe the fact that he had to remove the tweets to get his account reinstated as coercion. It is more accurate than saying "request", which, if you look it up in the dictionary, means "asking politely". Contrast that with "order" or "demand", which involves an element of ]. |
|
|
-- Mr Gillespie ] (]) 03:49, 10 January 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Stock market reaction to Trump ban == |
|
|
|
|
|
This should be here. is one source.— ] • ] • ] • 20:25, 12 January 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
This is what I started to add, but it doesn't really say Trump being banned is the reason. |
|
|
|
|
|
<nowiki>==Stock market reaction to bans==</nowiki><br> |
|
|
On January 11, 2021, stocks of ], ], Apple, Facebook and Twitter fell significantly, David Keller of StockCharts.com credited fear of increased regulation for the selloff. <ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.kiplinger.com/investing/stocks/602060/stock-market-today-011121-big-tech-stocks-thumped-after-banning-trump|title=Stock Market Today: Big Tech Stocks Thumped After Banning Trump|last=Woodley|first=Kyle|work=]|date=11 January 2021|accessdate=12 January 2021}}</ref><br> |
|
|
— ] • ] • ] • 21:12, 12 January 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi {{U|Vchimpanzee}}, I found an as well as an , however I to think that stock prices are not really ] for an article on Donald Trump's usage of social media.--] (]) 21:43, 12 January 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
:Now that it's clear the headlines are misleading, I would agree.— ] • ] • ] • 21:58, 12 January 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
{{reflist-talk}} |
|
|
|
|
|
== Is Sockpuppeting the correct term? == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hello, UK reader here. I'm reading this sentence: "''Allies of Trump who posted on his behalf, including''........" and noticed that the hyperlink in "who posted on his behalf" is linked to a wikipedia article on sockpuppets. Is this correct? I thought from other media articles that the people who posted for the (former) US President after he was banned did so of their own accord and not using false accounts. It struck me as the wrong link. The external articles I read on Gary Coby said he renamed his Twitter account himself and no false accounts were created. Is that sockpuppeting? |
|
|
Doesn't affect me either way but just something for thoughts. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 22:02, 21 January 2021 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
|
|
|
== Verified symbol == |
|
|
|
|
|
Do we really need a verified symbol for the tweet he posted when other articles with tweets do not have the symbol <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 10:17, 11 February 2021 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
|
|
|
== Semi-protected edit request on 13 February 2021 == |
|
|
|
|
|
{{edit semi-protected|Social media use by Donald Trump|answered=yes}} |
|
|
In the "Satire and archives" section, please delete the first paragraph, which currently reads 'In May 2017, Trump misspelled the word "coverage" as "covfefe," which quickly turned into a meme on the Internet.' This event is covered in more detail in the "Other controversial tweets" section of this article as well as the separate ] article, which both correctly state that the "coverage" interpretation is merely speculative. It might be relevant to describe here how the covfefe tweet has been the subject of satire, but there is no such material here at this time. Therefore this statement is out of place and incorrect, and the best result will come from simply removing it. ] (]) 00:40, 13 February 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:] '''Done'''<!-- Template:ESp -->. ] (]) 04:59, 13 February 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Semi-protected edit request on 14 February 2021 == |
|
|
|
|
|
{{edit semi-protected|Social media use by Donald Trump|answered=yes}} |
|
|
In the "Satire and archives" section, please change |
|
|
|
|
|
In January 2019, Trump served hamburgers from McDonald's to the Clemson Tigers champion football team due to the White House's catering staff going on strike. |
|
|
|
|
|
to |
|
|
|
|
|
In January 2019, Trump served hamburgers from McDonald's to the Clemson Tigers champion football team due to the White House's catering staff being furloughed during a government shutdown. |
|
|
|
|
|
The text "government shutdown" should be cross-linked to the ] article. |
|
|
|
|
|
This change is already supported by the existing reference, which does not say anything about a "strike." |
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks. ] (]) 21:51, 14 February 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:] '''Done'''<!-- Template:ESp -->. I slightly reworded it to be more specific than "a government shutdown" but it was basically what you wrote. ] (]) 01:23, 15 February 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::It looks good. Thanks! ] (]) 01:54, 15 February 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Semi-protected edit request on 18 March 2021 == |
|
== Semi-protected edit request on 18 March 2021 == |
I believe that the wording of the first line of "Other social media platforms > Facebook" regarding the ad pricing is unclear. It presently reads "Trump was charged less per ad than Clinton was, Wired claimed," but since the next clause contains potentially contradicting information, I believe a more clear presentation may be "Wired claimed that Trump was charged less per ad then Clinton was," and recommend some variation of a change for clarity.
I am not familiar enough with the citation best-practices on this wiki, so am uncertain whether this is a substantive issue or whether the existing text is correctly worded.--182.158.155.102 (talk) 11:05, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
I found a brief article in a newspaper I was looking at a few minutes ago, and I added some information to this article. The web site is surely notable enough to have its own article but I'm not ready to take the time that would be required to create an article that would stay. Although the site is clearly notable. Some might object to Miller's lofty predictions but I thought it was worth mentioning. I declined to include the lack of information of Trump's ban, or his bragging about how well he handled COVID-19, but for a full article on the site those probably should be mentioned even if they make the article sound biased.
Miller said in the source used that Trump would return in several months, while the article before I changed it said the site would launch in two or three months. Obviously that was not the case and I just used the correct statement by Miller and a different source which linked to the one I removed.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:11, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: