Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/PlainAndSimpleTailor: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 13:54, 21 April 2021 editCambial Yellowing (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers16,190 edits ce← Previous edit		Revision as of 07:06, 2 May 2021 edit undoFDW777 (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users27,732 edits →Comments by other users: add commentNext edit →
Line 19:		Line 19:
	====<big>Comments by other users</big>====		====<big>Comments by other users</big>====
	<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small>		<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small>
			Of particular interest also is , where they passively aggressively demand that {{tq\|I think perhaps one or more of the more passionate editors should take a break from the page}}. This is similar to by {{IPvandal\|79.66.34.195}} where they say {{tq\|I think perhaps this editor should consider taking a break from this article}}. PlainAndSimpleTailor used the similar {{IPvandal\|79.66.51.226}}, as they admitted . ] (]) 07:06, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

	====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>====		====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>====

Revision as of 07:06, 2 May 2021

– This SPI case is open.

Edits immediately focused on the article where their actions had them blocked
Geographic location (puppeteer location public as edited as IP and regularly slipped between IP and logged-in edits)
removal of exact same material that blocked user sought to remove repeatedly, and without mentioning removal in edit summary - frequent tactic of blocked user
– references to the article being messy (as here); labelling editors as nationalists/nationalist arguments (as here & here); need of an "overhaul" (as here)

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. Of particular interest also is this edit, where they passively aggressively demand that I think perhaps one or more of the more passionate editors should take a break from the page. This is similar to this post on the same talk page by 79.66.34.195 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) where they say I think perhaps this editor should consider taking a break from this article. PlainAndSimpleTailor used the similar 79.66.51.226 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), as they admitted here. FDW777 (talk) 07:06, 2 May 2021 (UTC)