| Revision as of 12:48, 22 August 2019 editIvanvector (talk | contribs)Checkusers, Administrators52,267 editsm Ivanvector moved page Talk:Persian people/to do to Talk:Persians/to do: Per requested move 15 July 2019 and move review.← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:21, 9 May 2021 edit undoAManWithNoPlan (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users96,097 edits wrong linkNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| *]: Expand the article's intro. | *]: Expand the article's intro. | ||
| * |
* Provide citations for all of the <code><nowiki>{{fact}}</nowiki></code>s.<sup>]]</sup> | ||
| *Ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of ]. See also ].<sup>]]</sup> | *Ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of ]. See also ].<sup>]]</sup> | ||
| *Watch for ] that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's ].) | *Watch for ] that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's ].) | ||
Revision as of 20:21, 9 May 2021
- Lead: Expand the article's intro.
- Provide citations for all of the
{{fact}}s. - Ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Misplaced Pages's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.
- Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
- While additive terms like “also”, “in addition”, “additionally”, “moreover”, and “furthermore” may sometimes be useful, overusing them when they aren't necessary can instead detract from the brilliancy of the article.
- Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “
Allpigs are pink, so we thought ofa number ofways to turn them green.”