Revision as of 16:21, 7 May 2021 editSurv1v4l1st (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers26,257 edits →Merger proposal: Reply.← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:06, 20 May 2021 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,302,204 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Facial (sexual act)/Archive 4) (botNext edit → | ||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Auto archiving notice |bot=Lowercase sigmabot III |age=90 |units=days}} | {{Auto archiving notice |bot=Lowercase sigmabot III |age=90 |units=days}} | ||
== Semi-protected edit request on 18 February 2021 == | |||
{{edit semi-protected|Facial (sexual act)|answered=yes}} | |||
I believe the image depicting a white woman receiving a black man's cum should be changed to a similar image of a black woman receiving white man's cum. This will help racial diversity, improve race relations, and make Misplaced Pages a place for all to enjoy. | |||
Thank you. ] (]) 15:07, 18 February 2021 (UTC) | |||
: You'd have to find another free image to use and start an RFC to see if anyone wants to change the status quo. ] (]) 16:12, 18 February 2021 (UTC) | |||
::OP Indefinately blocked. -] ] 19:23, 18 February 2021 (UTC) | |||
== Merger proposal == | == Merger proposal == |
Revision as of 02:06, 20 May 2021
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Facial (sexual act) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
Misplaced Pages is not censored. Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Misplaced Pages's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image. |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Facial (sexual act) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
Merger proposal
I propose to merge Pearl necklace (sexual act) into Facial (sexual act). Currently the pearl necklace article is a dictionary definition plus a collection of pop-culture trivia. Most of the current sources are passing mentions or dictionary definitions; the closest thing to WP:SIGCOV is the entry in Sex Tips for Straight Women from a Gay Man, which definitely isn't WP:SCHOLARSHIP. I looked for additional sources and found only dictionary entries (example), junk sources, and trivial coverage. Cheers, gnu57 14:09, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support. Makes sense, and even if the above didn't apply, the two concepts are so closely related that WP:No page could be invoked. Crossroads 03:44, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support as well, a sub-section would be more than enough. Hopefully if we merge there'll finally be an excuse to get rid of the picture on Pearl necklace (sexual act). ThadeusOfNazereth 04:19, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
- Against. The neck is not a face. Mghabmw (talk) 13:24, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
- Against. A facial is a specific sexual act which involves ejaculating on the face, often as the climax to fellatio. A pearl necklace is a specific sexual act which evolves ejaculating on the neck and chest area, often as the climax to mammary intercourse. These are specific sexual acts and they are not the same.Johnny Rose 11 (talk) 01:58, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support: Plus the Pearl necklace article is a stub and I'm in favor of the move. Note when facials go wrong, it sometimes creates a 'pearl necklace'. Additionally the neck is just below the face. Thanks. JayzBox (talk) 03:24, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
- Against. Per reasons above. --Surv1v4l1st 16:21, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages objectionable content
- All unassessed articles
- B-Class Sexology and sexuality articles
- Mid-importance Sexology and sexuality articles
- WikiProject Sexology and sexuality articles
- B-Class Pornography articles
- Mid-importance Pornography articles
- B-Class Mid-importance Pornography articles
- WikiProject Pornography articles