| Revision as of 15:49, 22 January 2007 editLethaniol (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,498 edits added and edited← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:07, 22 January 2007 edit undoLethaniol (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,498 edits updateNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| *<strike>Do we want a section on alleged teaching about Lucifer?</strike> | *<strike>Do we want a section on alleged teaching about Lucifer?</strike> | ||
| **New section in Antrhoposophy, new question is do we have sources for the influence of Lucifer on teaching? | **New section in Antrhoposophy, new question is do we have sources for the influence of Lucifer on teaching? | ||
| * |
*Add section about the temperaments. | ||
| ⚫ | *Is Petrash/Barnes an acceptable source, and if so to back up what sort of information? | ||
| **Currently no draft for this section written | |||
| ⚫ | *Is Petrash an acceptable source, and if so to back up what sort of information? | ||
Revision as of 16:07, 22 January 2007
This To Do box is only for controversial issues that still need to be to be resolved - see here for more information. Once an item has resolved please strike out using <strike> function.
- Waldorf schools = religious or spiritual?
Do we want a section on alleged teaching about Lucifer?- New section in Antrhoposophy, new question is do we have sources for the influence of Lucifer on teaching?
- Add section about the temperaments.
- Is Petrash/Barnes an acceptable source, and if so to back up what sort of information?