Misplaced Pages

Gay agenda: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:11, 21 January 2007 view sourceCoelacan (talk | contribs)14,831 edits Revert to last version by WJBscribe. Please discuss controversial changes on the talk page first.← Previous edit Revision as of 19:19, 22 January 2007 view source Janusvulcan (talk | contribs)80 edits Revert to last version by janusvulcan. Aritlce reads as if trying to accuse someone. Controversial POV should be discussed on the talk page first.Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{dablink|This article is about the political term. For the satirical essay by Michael Swift, see ]}} {{dablink|This article is about the political term. For the satirical essay by Michael Swift, see ]}}
The '''homosexual agenda''' (or the '''gay agenda''') is a term used by social conservatives to describe the goal of increasing ] acceptance through public policies, media exposure, and cultural change. Most often, the term is employed by ] in reference to what they see as the attempt to redefine ] and ], and shift focus away from what they consider traditional morality. Some such critics of the LGBT movement argue that this agenda is a secret one,<ref name="osten">Osten, Craig (2003). </ref> whilst others who believe there is a "homosexual agenda" don't describe it as secretive.<ref>Fleming, Mike (2006). Washington Blade Online.</ref> The '''homosexual agenda''' (or the '''gay agenda''') is a term used to describe the goal of increasing ] acceptance through public policies, media exposure, and cultural change. The LGBT movement argues that this agenda is not a secret one,<ref name="osten">Osten, Craig (2003). </ref> whilst others who believe there is a "homosexual agenda" do describe it as a secret agenda .<ref>Fleming, Mike (2006). Washington Blade Online.</ref>


The term is offensive to many,<ref name="glaad">{{cite web|url=http://www.glaad.org/media/guide/offensive.php|title=Offensive Terminology to Avoid|publisher=GLAAD}}</ref> particularly those who view the goals of the movement to be equal rights. Sometimes those who would be offended by a serious reference to this term still use it satirically or sarcastically.<ref></ref><ref></ref><ref>Bishop Gene Robinson, addressing the General Convention of the Episcopal Church in the United States of America on 14 June 2006, for example, declared that "Jesus is the homosexual agenda in the Episcopal Church".</ref> The term is offensive to homosexuals,<ref name="glaad">{{cite web|url=http://www.glaad.org/media/guide/offensive.php|title=Offensive Terminology to Avoid|publisher=GLAAD}}</ref> particularly those who view the goals of the movement to be equal rights. Sometimes homosexuals who would be offended by a serious reference to this term still use it satirically or sarcastically.<ref></ref><ref></ref><ref>Bishop Gene Robinson, addressing the General Convention of the Episcopal Church in the United States of America on 14 June 2006, for example, declared that "Jesus is the homosexual agenda in the Episcopal Church".</ref>


==Use of the term== ==Use of the term==

Revision as of 19:19, 22 January 2007

This article is about the political term. For the satirical essay by Michael Swift, see Homosexual Agenda

The homosexual agenda (or the gay agenda) is a term used to describe the goal of increasing LGBT acceptance through public policies, media exposure, and cultural change. The LGBT movement argues that this agenda is not a secret one, whilst others who believe there is a "homosexual agenda" do describe it as a secret agenda .

The term is offensive to homosexuals, particularly those who view the goals of the movement to be equal rights. Sometimes homosexuals who would be offended by a serious reference to this term still use it satirically or sarcastically.

Use of the term

James Dobson, director of Focus on the Family and a regular social Christian conservative commentator in the popular media, describes the homosexual agenda as follows:

Those goals include universal acceptance of the gay lifestyle, discrediting of scriptures that condemn homosexuality, muzzling of the clergy and Christian media, granting of special privileges and rights in the law, overturning laws prohibiting pedophilia, indoctrinating children and future generations through public education, and securing all the legal benefits of marriage for any two or more people who claim to have homosexual tendencies.

Alan Sears and Craig Osten, president and vice-president of the Alliance Defense Fund, offer another characterization of the homosexual agenda:

It is an agenda that they basically set in the late 1980s, in a book called 'After the Ball,' where they laid out a six-point plan for how they could transform the beliefs of ordinary Americans with regard to homosexual behavior — in a decade-long time frame.... They admit it privately, but they will not say that publicly. In their private publications, homosexual activists make it very clear that there is an agenda. The six-point agenda that they laid out in 1989 was explicit: Talk about gays and gayness as loudly and as often as possible... Portray gays as victims, not as aggressive challengers... Give homosexual protectors a just cause... Make gays look good... Make the victimizers look bad... Get funds from corporate America.

The term appears in many forums from political commentary to talk radio, and even once by the U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, who wrote in his dissent in the landmark case Lawrence v. Texas that the "law-profession culture... has largely signed on to the so-called homosexual agenda, by which I mean the agenda promoted by some homosexual activists directed at eliminating the moral opprobrium that has traditionally attached to homosexual conduct.". The majority opinion of the Court contained no reference to this term.

Opposition to the term's use

Groups such as the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation deny the existence of any secret or subversive agenda. They state that their major goal is to end discrimination in housing, employment and public accommodations and to achieve equality for LGBT persons. These groups describe the term as a "rhetorical invention of anti-gay extremists seeking to create a climate of fear by portraying the pursuit of civil rights for LGBT people as sinister". Some members of the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) community consider their political goals to be too heterogeneous to be grouped together into one single agenda.

Specific controversies

Some issues often listed as included in the agenda are hotly debated today, from same-sex marriage, to hate crime laws, to same-sex sex education, and more. The arguments behind these debates are subtle, and many people find themselves on opposite sides of the debate on different issues. Arguments from religious opposition to homosexuality and from civil rights principles are common in these discussions.

See also

External links

References

  1. ^ Osten, Craig (2003). "Q&A: The Homosexual Agenda"
  2. Fleming, Mike (2006). "Yes, Virginia. There is a gay agenda, and it's totally wack." Washington Blade Online.
  3. ^ "Offensive Terminology to Avoid". GLAAD.
  4. Finally, the Homosexual Agenda, in Five Words or Less
  5. The Homosexual Agenda
  6. Bishop Gene Robinson, addressing the General Convention of the Episcopal Church in the United States of America on 14 June 2006, for example, declared that "Jesus is the homosexual agenda in the Episcopal Church".
  7. Dobson, Dr. James (2005). "Marriage Under Fire".
  8. Scalia, Antonin (2003). "John Geddes Lawrence and Tyron Garner, petitioners v. Texas". FindLaw: Lawrence et al. v. Texas (June 2003).
  9. Bouley II, Charles Karel (2005). "The gay agenda revealed!"
Categories: