| Revision as of 17:30, 22 January 2007 editPete K (talk | contribs)3,760 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:02, 22 January 2007 edit undoHenitsirk (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users667 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| *<strike>Do we want a section on alleged teaching about Lucifer?</strike> ''I don't think that has been decided - the only decision has been about the source. Teachers ''are'' teaching about Lucifer (as others here have testified) and if a different source says/confirms this, it definitely belongs in an article about Waldorf.'' '''] 17:27, 22 January 2007 (UTC)''' | *<strike>Do we want a section on alleged teaching about Lucifer?</strike> ''I don't think that has been decided - the only decision has been about the source. Teachers ''are'' teaching about Lucifer (as others here have testified) and if a different source says/confirms this, it definitely belongs in an article about Waldorf.'' '''] 17:27, 22 January 2007 (UTC)''' | ||
| **New section in Antrhoposophy, new question is do we have sources for the influence of Lucifer on teaching? ''The Anthroposophy section should talk about Lucifer and Ahriman. There's no need to link this topic to teaching in that article. If there's a link to teaching, it belongs in the Waldorf article and should reference the more thoroughly covered treatment of this topic in the Anthroposophy article.'' '''] 17:27, 22 January 2007 (UTC)''' | **New section in Antrhoposophy, new question is do we have sources for the influence of Lucifer on teaching? ''The Anthroposophy section should talk about Lucifer and Ahriman. There's no need to link this topic to teaching in that article. If there's a link to teaching, it belongs in the Waldorf article and should reference the more thoroughly covered treatment of this topic in the Anthroposophy article.'' '''] 17:27, 22 January 2007 (UTC)''' | ||
| *Add section about the temperaments. | *<strike>Add section about the temperaments.</strike> | ||
| *Is Petrash/Barnes an acceptable source, and if so to back up what sort of information? | *Is Petrash/Barnes an acceptable source, and if so to back up what sort of information? | ||
Revision as of 21:02, 22 January 2007
This To Do box is only for controversial issues that still need to be to be resolved - see here for more information. Once an item has resolved please strike out using <strike> function.
- Waldorf schools = religious or spiritual?
Do we want a section on alleged teaching about Lucifer?I don't think that has been decided - the only decision has been about the source. Teachers are teaching about Lucifer (as others here have testified) and if a different source says/confirms this, it definitely belongs in an article about Waldorf. Pete K 17:27, 22 January 2007 (UTC)- New section in Antrhoposophy, new question is do we have sources for the influence of Lucifer on teaching? The Anthroposophy section should talk about Lucifer and Ahriman. There's no need to link this topic to teaching in that article. If there's a link to teaching, it belongs in the Waldorf article and should reference the more thoroughly covered treatment of this topic in the Anthroposophy article. Pete K 17:27, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
Add section about the temperaments.- Is Petrash/Barnes an acceptable source, and if so to back up what sort of information?