| Revision as of 04:22, 25 August 2004 editGbleem (talk | contribs)4,630 editsm semicolon← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:57, 18 October 2004 edit undo129.123.104.6 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| ] and F. C. Frank predicted the effect on theoretical grounds before ]. | ] and F. C. Frank predicted the effect on theoretical grounds before ]. | ||
| The practical problem with muon-catalyzed fusion is that muons are unstable (decaying in two microseconds); hence, there needs to be some cheap means of producing muons, and the muons so produced must be arranged to catalyze as many reactions as possible before decaying. As J.D. Jackson recognized in his seminal 1957 paper, "Catalysis of Nuclear Reactions between Hydrogen Isotopes by <math>mu-</math> Mesons," ''Physical Review'', Vol. 106, No. 2, April 15, 1957, the real problem with muon-catalyzed fusion is that there is a non-vanishing probability (about 1%, actually) that the muon would "stick" to the <math>alpha</math> particle (a Helium-4 nucleus) that results from the ] and ] fusion, removing the muon from the catalysis process. Even if the muon were absolutely stable, it could only catalyze about 100 fusions before sticking, about |
The practical problem with muon-catalyzed fusion is that muons are unstable (decaying in two microseconds); hence, there needs to be some cheap means of producing muons, and the muons so produced must be arranged to catalyze as many reactions as possible before decaying. As J.D. Jackson recognized in his seminal 1957 paper, "Catalysis of Nuclear Reactions between Hydrogen Isotopes by <math>mu-</math> Mesons," ''Physical Review'', Vol. 106, No. 2, April 15, 1957, the real problem with muon-catalyzed fusion is that there is a non-vanishing probability (about 1%, actually) that the muon would "stick" to the <math>alpha</math> particle (a Helium-4 nucleus) that results from the ] and ] fusion, removing the muon from the catalysis process. Even if the muon were absolutely stable, it could only catalyze, on average about 100 fusions before sticking, about one fifth the number needed to produce ] energy. | ||
| ==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 02:57, 18 October 2004
Muon-catalyzed fusion is a process that allows fusion at room temperature. Although it can be produced reliably with the right equipment and has been much studied, it does not currently provide anywhere close to breakeven energy. It is sometimes known as cold fusion; this term, however, is no longer often used, as it can create confusion with other scientifically unestablished forms of room-temperature fusion.
In muon-catalyzed fusion, deuterium and tritium nuclei form atoms with muons, which are essentially heavy electrons. The muons orbit very close to the nuclei, shielding the positive charge of the nuclei so the nuclei can move close enough to fuse.
Andrei Sakharov and F. C. Frank predicted the effect on theoretical grounds before 1950.
The practical problem with muon-catalyzed fusion is that muons are unstable (decaying in two microseconds); hence, there needs to be some cheap means of producing muons, and the muons so produced must be arranged to catalyze as many reactions as possible before decaying. As J.D. Jackson recognized in his seminal 1957 paper, "Catalysis of Nuclear Reactions between Hydrogen Isotopes by Mesons," Physical Review, Vol. 106, No. 2, April 15, 1957, the real problem with muon-catalyzed fusion is that there is a non-vanishing probability (about 1%, actually) that the muon would "stick" to the particle (a Helium-4 nucleus) that results from the deuterium and tritium fusion, removing the muon from the catalysis process. Even if the muon were absolutely stable, it could only catalyze, on average about 100 fusions before sticking, about one fifth the number needed to produce breakeven energy.
Mesons," Physical Review, Vol. 106, No. 2, April 15, 1957, the real problem with muon-catalyzed fusion is that there is a non-vanishing probability (about 1%, actually) that the muon would "stick" to the 
particle (a Helium-4 nucleus) that results from the References
- Rafelski, Johann and Steven E. Jones (1987). "Cold Nuclear Fusion". Scientific American, v. 257 #1, pp. 84–89.
See also
nuclear fusion, Antimatter catalyzed nuclear pulse propulsion