| Revision as of 21:03, 22 January 2007 editHenitsirk (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users667 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:03, 22 January 2007 edit undoLethaniol (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,498 edits removed comments by Pete moved to talk page - this is for issues not discussionNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| *Waldorf schools = religious or spiritual? | *Waldorf schools = religious or spiritual? | ||
| *<strike>Do we want a section on alleged teaching about Lucifer?</strike> | |||
| *<strike>Do we want a section on alleged teaching about Lucifer?</strike> ''I don't think that has been decided - the only decision has been about the source. Teachers ''are'' teaching about Lucifer (as others here have testified) and if a different source says/confirms this, it definitely belongs in an article about Waldorf.'' '''] 17:27, 22 January 2007 (UTC)''' | |||
| **New section in Antrhoposophy, new question is do we have sources for the influence of Lucifer on teaching? |
**New section in Antrhoposophy, new question is do we have sources for the influence of Lucifer on teaching? | ||
| *<strike>Add section about the temperaments.</strike> | *<strike>Add section about the temperaments.</strike> | ||
| *Is Petrash/Barnes an acceptable source, and if so to back up what sort of information? | *Is Petrash/Barnes an acceptable source, and if so to back up what sort of information? | ||
Revision as of 22:03, 22 January 2007
This To Do box is only for controversial issues that still need to be to be resolved - see here for more information. Once an item has resolved please strike out using <strike> function.
- Waldorf schools = religious or spiritual?
Do we want a section on alleged teaching about Lucifer?- New section in Antrhoposophy, new question is do we have sources for the influence of Lucifer on teaching?
Add section about the temperaments.- Is Petrash/Barnes an acceptable source, and if so to back up what sort of information?
- Add a Waldorf criticism section.