| Revision as of 19:26, 23 January 2007 editClean Copy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers21,190 editsm (saw the discussion on talk page)← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:27, 23 January 2007 edit undoLethaniol (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,498 edits Sorry I added the criticism section yesterday - once something is completed strike it out and add another coment if needed.Next edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| *<strike>Add section about the temperaments.</strike> | *<strike>Add section about the temperaments.</strike> | ||
| *Is Petrash/Barnes an acceptable source, and if so to back up what sort of information? | *Is Petrash/Barnes an acceptable source, and if so to back up what sort of information? | ||
| *Add a Waldorf criticism section. | *<strike>Add a Waldorf criticism section.</strike> | ||
| **Add other sections to criticism section - currently only Racism | |||
Revision as of 19:27, 23 January 2007
This To Do box is only for controversial issues that still need to be to be resolved - see here for more information. Once an item has resolved please strike out using <strike> function.
- Waldorf schools = religious or spiritual?
Do we want a section on alleged teaching about Lucifer?- New Lucifer/Ahriman section in Antrhoposophy
- New question is do we
haveneedhave sources for the influence of Lucifer on teaching?
- New question is do we
- New Lucifer/Ahriman section in Antrhoposophy
Add section about the temperaments.- Is Petrash/Barnes an acceptable source, and if so to back up what sort of information?
Add a Waldorf criticism section.- Add other sections to criticism section - currently only Racism