| Revision as of 16:47, 7 June 2021 editSzmenderowiecki (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,875 edits →Featuring your work on Misplaced Pages's front page: DYKs: ReplyTag: Reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:52, 7 June 2021 edit undoGizzyCatBella (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers17,604 edits →Alert: new sectionTags: contentious topics alert 2017 wikitext editorNext edit → | ||
| Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
| :{{ping|Piotrus}} Thank you for the information. | :{{ping|Piotrus}} Thank you for the information. | ||
| :I don't believe that I would want to get the page to DYK for now, though. The optics of an DYK nominee with a POV template in the body aren't very good; there is a moderate risk of edit warring occurring due to the article, as the discussion on the talk page is heated, and I don't believe DYK reviewers want any of that; and, most importantly, I struggle to find a good hook for that (probably his being fired from IPN for his comments on Wałęsa?) If you want to co-participate in it, no problem, but personally I fear that the nomination will only waste other users' time. ] (]) 16:47, 7 June 2021 (UTC) | :I don't believe that I would want to get the page to DYK for now, though. The optics of an DYK nominee with a POV template in the body aren't very good; there is a moderate risk of edit warring occurring due to the article, as the discussion on the talk page is heated, and I don't believe DYK reviewers want any of that; and, most importantly, I struggle to find a good hook for that (probably his being fired from IPN for his comments on Wałęsa?) If you want to co-participate in it, no problem, but personally I fear that the nomination will only waste other users' time. ] (]) 16:47, 7 June 2021 (UTC) | ||
| == Alert == | |||
| {{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' | |||
| You have shown interest in the Balkans or Eastern Europe. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called ] is in effect. Any administrator may impose ] on editors who do not strictly follow ], or the ], when making edits related to the topic. | |||
| For additional information, please see the ] and the ] decision ]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. | |||
| }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> - <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]]</span></small> 18:52, 7 June 2021 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:52, 7 June 2021
Welcome!
Hi Szmenderowiecki! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Misplaced Pages community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Misplaced Pages page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! Thedefender35 19:42, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Wikileaks RfC
Hi, did you intend to refactor my comment (which I had changed earlier) here? Or was it an accident? JBchrch (talk) 11:25, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
- @JBchrch: It was an accident. I was trying to reformulate the RfC (which I hope is much better right now), and while I was trying to take into account all new comments that were being made during my preparation for the edit (I was warned about edit conflicts several times, so I included new comments that were made in the meantime), I probably inadvertently took the old version of the post instead of your corrected one. I did not mean to directly change anyone's vote, including yours. Sorry for the inconvenience. Szmenderowiecki (talk) 11:49, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
- No worries Szmenderowiecki, just try to be careful about that. It's indeed not easy making vast changed to the noticeboards. JBchrch (talk) 11:53, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Alert
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Till your reached 500 edits you are not allowed to participate in I/P discussions on various boards.I will strike your comments. --Shrike (talk) 09:41, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
CNN not calling the lab origin a conspiracy theory
I don't appreciate the PA at the rfc either. That Hong Kong business correspondent? She wrote this headline for the Times in February 2020: “Senator Tom Cotton Repeats Fringe Theory of Coronavirus Origins.”
“Scientists,” the slug reads, “have dismissed suggestions that the Chinese government was behind the outbreak, but it’s the kind of tale that gains traction among those who see China as a threat.”
“Republican who floated virus conspiracy says ‘common sense has been my guide,'” the weekend editor at The Guardian dismissively explained.
“A GOP senator,” our award-winning Saudi investigator declared, “keeps pushing a thoroughly debunked theory that the Wuhan coronavirus is a leaked Chinese biological weapon gone wrong.”
“Sen. Tom Cotton Flogs Coronavirus Conspiracy Theory Dismissed by Actual Scientists,” the editor of The Daily Beast howled.
“Tom Cotton’s veiled threats really aren’t helping,” Maddow’s blogger chimed in.
“Don’t Listen To Sen. Tom Cotton About Coronavirus,” our “media disinformation” boy piped up.
“Tom Cotton and the virus conspiracy theory,” the three-decades veteran of an Arkansas weekly blogged, citing a Vanity Fair write-up that maintained far more nuance than the grizzled blogger.
“Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) repeated a fringe theory,” the young Post staffer confidently led, “suggesting that the ongoing spread of a coronavirus is connected to research in the disease-ravaged epicenter of Wuhan, China.” That “theory,” her headline definitively states, “was already debunked.”
“Senator Tom Cotton Ramps Up Anti-China Rhetoric,” Forbes’ “Under 30 community lead” righteously wrote.
“Tom Cotton,” CNN’s Chris Cillizza authoritatively declared, “is playing a dangerous game with his coronavirus speculation.” 2601:46:C801:B1F0:DCB9:7D2F:45A6:B333 (talk) 15:42, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Community sanctions notice on covid-related topics
| This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
Template:Z33 Doug Weller talk 09:15, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Featuring your work on Misplaced Pages's front page: DYKs
Thank you for your recent articles, including Jan Żaryn, which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Misplaced Pages's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. This can be also done through this helpful user script: User:SD0001/DYK-helper. Let me know if you need help, Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:21, 7 June 2021 (UTC) Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:21, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Piotrus: Thank you for the information.
- I don't believe that I would want to get the page to DYK for now, though. The optics of an DYK nominee with a POV template in the body aren't very good; there is a moderate risk of edit warring occurring due to the article, as the discussion on the talk page is heated, and I don't believe DYK reviewers want any of that; and, most importantly, I struggle to find a good hook for that (probably his being fired from IPN for his comments on Wałęsa?) If you want to co-participate in it, no problem, but personally I fear that the nomination will only waste other users' time. Szmenderowiecki (talk) 16:47, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Alert
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in the Balkans or Eastern Europe. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.