Misplaced Pages

Talk:Ending Qualified Immunity Act: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:34, 2 July 2020 editRcsprinter123 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, IP block exemptions, Rollbackers81,845 edits move editathon to BLM template← Previous edit Revision as of 21:07, 10 June 2021 edit undoIsomorphic (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,546 edits Tripartisanship: new sectionTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile editNext edit →
Line 23: Line 23:
:: It would be at Congress.gov: . The article you cited says Amash is preparing it, so I guess he hasn't filed it yet. —] <span style="font-size:85%;">(it/they)</span> 21:53, 4 June 2020 (UTC) :: It would be at Congress.gov: . The article you cited says Amash is preparing it, so I guess he hasn't filed it yet. —] <span style="font-size:85%;">(it/they)</span> 21:53, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
:: There it is: {{USBill|116|HR|7085}}. —] <span style="font-size:85%;">(it/they)</span> 15:58, 5 June 2020 (UTC) :: There it is: {{USBill|116|HR|7085}}. —] <span style="font-size:85%;">(it/they)</span> 15:58, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

== Tripartisanship ==

I removed the claim that this was “the first tripartisan bill”. I don’t know for certain that this is untrue, but there were more than two parties in Congress for most of the time between the Civil War and World War II. It seems very unlikely that there were no bills in that entire period that were supported by members of at least three parties, and there have probably been bills supported by Representatives from four or more parties. ] (]) 21:07, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:07, 10 June 2021

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconBlack Lives Matter Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Black Lives Matter, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Black Lives Matter on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Black Lives MatterWikipedia:WikiProject Black Lives MatterTemplate:WikiProject Black Lives MatterBlack Lives Matter
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
Note icon
This article was created or improved during WikiProject Black Lives Matter's June 2020 edit-a-thon.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconDiscrimination Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconLaw Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconPolitics Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconUnited States: Government Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconU.S. Congress Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
This article is about one (or many) thing(s).

How significant is Pressley?

I'm confused by Ayanna Pressley being mentioned as if she were the author of the bill. There is a Boston Globe article that refers to it as "Pressley's bill" but according to information on it was introduce by Amash, and Pressley was just one of about 17 original cosponsors. Kevinpet (talk) 01:24, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Notable?

This bill has not been formally introduced in the House so there is no reference/bill number yet. Plus there's no formal draft language to it. Without those references, I'm not sure this is notable and worth an article. —GoldRingChip (it/they) 15:45, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

I would say with current events, even if this doesn't make it to the floor, it is still notable in its current form. While we don't have a collective name for the events catalyzed by the killing of George Floyd, this is strongly entangled with those events. —KJ4IPS (talk) 17:53, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
Probably, yes. But beware WP:RECENTISM. —GoldRingChip (it/they) 21:53, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
I would say definitely notable. It is historic – the first legislation introduced by a Libertarian in Congress. Starchild (talk)
@GoldRingChip: Where could I find a bill number? Is there a list somewhere? I'll keep an eye out for it, I assume it will happen soon. John Cummings (talk) 21:23, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
It would be at Congress.gov: here. The article you cited says Amash is preparing it, so I guess he hasn't filed it yet. —GoldRingChip (it/they) 21:53, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
There it is: H.R. 7085. —GoldRingChip (it/they) 15:58, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Tripartisanship

I removed the claim that this was “the first tripartisan bill”. I don’t know for certain that this is untrue, but there were more than two parties in Congress for most of the time between the Civil War and World War II. It seems very unlikely that there were no bills in that entire period that were supported by members of at least three parties, and there have probably been bills supported by Representatives from four or more parties. Isomorphic (talk) 21:07, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Categories: