| Revision as of 05:59, 11 June 2021 editDPL bot (talk | contribs)Bots671,864 edits dablink notification message (see the FAQ)← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:11, 18 June 2021 edit undoGizzyCatBella (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers17,604 edits →Alert: new sectionTags: contentious topics alert 2017 wikitext editorNext edit → | ||
| Line 106: | Line 106: | ||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 05:59, 11 June 2021 (UTC) | It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 05:59, 11 June 2021 (UTC) | ||
| == Alert == | |||
| {{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' | |||
| You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called ] is in effect. Any administrator may impose ] on editors who do not strictly follow ], or the ], when making edits related to the topic. | |||
| For additional information, please see the ] and the ] decision ]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. | |||
| }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> | |||
Revision as of 20:11, 18 June 2021
February 2021
Hello, I'm Ahmetlii. I noticed that you made a change to an article, 2021 Russian protests, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ahmetlii (talk) 15:30, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- I will add a source from the KPRF website.Potugin (talk) 15:31, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Welcome
|
Comment
Not that I am opposed to your edits, but that would be a much better source on the subject. My very best wishes (talk) 19:53, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- OK, feel free to add it to the article. I'm a frequent reader of Illaryonov's blog, not that I'd agree with everything he writes. Potugin (talk) 20:53, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- I think he just discredited himself (unfortunately, many Russians in US believe the same). I prefer interviews by Dmitry Gordon with different people he invites. My very best wishes (talk) 22:08, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- Well, there's no point in condemning someone completely just because he has expressed controversial views on some issue or you don't agree with him at all in something. E.g. Illaryonov also has non-mainstream views as to anthropogenic climate warming. And Navalny had his nationalist past.Potugin (talk) 12:20, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- I am not a fan of Navalny, but for a different reason. He was not telling whole truth like Politkovskaya, Litvinenko or even Rybkin (meaning the events in 1999). But this is easy to judge from here. If he did, we know what it means. But that does not matter for him now. My very best wishes (talk) 14:24, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Well, there's no point in condemning someone completely just because he has expressed controversial views on some issue or you don't agree with him at all in something. E.g. Illaryonov also has non-mainstream views as to anthropogenic climate warming. And Navalny had his nationalist past.Potugin (talk) 12:20, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- I think he just discredited himself (unfortunately, many Russians in US believe the same). I prefer interviews by Dmitry Gordon with different people he invites. My very best wishes (talk) 22:08, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Parizhskiy vestnik moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Parizhskiy vestnik, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Misplaced Pages). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Misplaced Pages's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Roller26 (talk) 21:15, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Your recent edit
This is unacceptable for several reasons. First, you accuse me of "pushing" some ideas. Accusation of misbehaviour is a personal attack, and if such a statement is placed to an edit summary, you cannot withdraw it. In future, please, be more cautious with edit summaries. Second, as I already explained in my edit summary, infoboxes are just article's summaries, and the article tells nothing about Marxism-Leninism as a "motive". Therefore, my edit is in agreement with our guidelines, whereas yours is not. Third, you write about "Maoism", whereas the statement added by you tells about a much broader category, Marxism-Leninism. Therefore, your edit is inconsistent with your rationale. I suggest you to self-revert and join a talk page discussion instead.--Paul Siebert (talk) 00:50, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nationalist Liberal Party, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Independent Liberal Party. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Alert
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.