Revision as of 04:34, 9 September 2006 edit65.54.155.46 (talk)No edit summary | Revision as of 18:11, 24 January 2007 edit undoSrl (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,914 edits velveeta = ECP?Next edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=== velveeta = ECP? === | |||
Stub | |||
I have not heard of velveeta as being non-commercial spam. says: ''Also knows as ECP; a message that is excessively cross-posted, as opposed to spam which is too frequently posted. This term is widely recognized but not commonly used; most people refer to both kinds of abuse as spam. Compare jello.'' ECP = excessive cross posting. See also and . 「]·]」 18:11, 24 January 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:11, 24 January 2007
velveeta = ECP?
I have not heard of velveeta as being non-commercial spam. The jargon file says: Also knows as ECP; a message that is excessively cross-posted, as opposed to spam which is too frequently posted. This term is widely recognized but not commonly used; most people refer to both kinds of abuse as spam. Compare jello. ECP = excessive cross posting. See also and "On 1995.Jun.16 clewis@ferret.ocunix.on.ca (Chris Lewis) proposed this taxonomy of net abuse". 「ѕʀʟ·✎」 18:11, 24 January 2007 (UTC)