| Revision as of 01:17, 5 May 2021 edit2001:569:74d2:a800:85c8:c206:c47b:849f (talk) →The $1,000,000 Chance of a LifetimeTag: Reverted← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:36, 28 June 2021 edit undoDawgDeputy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users12,937 edits Removed outdated and unwarranted message.Tag: UndoNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| Hi - just following up on the ANI report. I've asked the other editor on their talk page not to be so in your face with warning templates, and to explain their thinking rather than edit warring; I hope you don't mind if I follow up with a couple of pointers for you too? Basically, Misplaced Pages articles should ideally be based around what independent, reliable sources say about a subject. I know if sounds a bit crazy to call 'watching a gameshow' ], but if you're figuring out the rules by watching the show, that's what you're doing - you're watching what happens, interpreting how the game works, and then writing your interpretation up here - we don't do that. My usual advice to editors is that if you can't find it in an independent, reliable source, leave it out of the article - it doesn't belong. So, yeah - I can see why they reverted you, but they didn't go about it in a very collegiate way. Hope this makes sense, let me know if you have any questions. Cheers ]] 17:27, 20 April 2020 (UTC) | Hi - just following up on the ANI report. I've asked the other editor on their talk page not to be so in your face with warning templates, and to explain their thinking rather than edit warring; I hope you don't mind if I follow up with a couple of pointers for you too? Basically, Misplaced Pages articles should ideally be based around what independent, reliable sources say about a subject. I know if sounds a bit crazy to call 'watching a gameshow' ], but if you're figuring out the rules by watching the show, that's what you're doing - you're watching what happens, interpreting how the game works, and then writing your interpretation up here - we don't do that. My usual advice to editors is that if you can't find it in an independent, reliable source, leave it out of the article - it doesn't belong. So, yeah - I can see why they reverted you, but they didn't go about it in a very collegiate way. Hope this makes sense, let me know if you have any questions. Cheers ]] 17:27, 20 April 2020 (UTC) | ||
| :Makes perfect sense. ] (]) 19:54, 20 April 2020 (UTC) | :Makes perfect sense. ] (]) 19:54, 20 April 2020 (UTC) | ||
| == The $1,000,000 Chance of a Lifetime == | |||
| Hi, please do not revert some of my edits. I already explain at the edit summary because Mark Summers is the announcer for "The $1,000,000 Chance of a Lifetime" first few weeks, not Marc Summers, the 1986 Double Dare host. You're reverting by mistake. Now discuss first not revert all of my edits. I hope you will respond of my edits regarding my explanation yesterday. Thanks. ] (]) 01:05, 5 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
| :Also, I almost forgot please do not revert and restore the American flag on templates on television shows they never put national flags on television programs they don't do that. I hope you will understand to never put the American flag on television programs including "The $1,000,000 Chance of a Lifetime". It was one of my explanations you mistakenly revert. I hope you will respond to me as well. OK? ] (]) 01:16, 5 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:36, 28 June 2021
 Archives |
Your ANI report
Hi - just following up on the ANI report. I've asked the other editor on their talk page not to be so in your face with warning templates, and to explain their thinking rather than edit warring; I hope you don't mind if I follow up with a couple of pointers for you too? Basically, Misplaced Pages articles should ideally be based around what independent, reliable sources say about a subject. I know if sounds a bit crazy to call 'watching a gameshow' original research, but if you're figuring out the rules by watching the show, that's what you're doing - you're watching what happens, interpreting how the game works, and then writing your interpretation up here - we don't do that. My usual advice to editors is that if you can't find it in an independent, reliable source, leave it out of the article - it doesn't belong. So, yeah - I can see why they reverted you, but they didn't go about it in a very collegiate way. Hope this makes sense, let me know if you have any questions. Cheers GirthSummit (blether) 17:27, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Makes perfect sense. DawgDeputy (talk) 19:54, 20 April 2020 (UTC)