| Revision as of 23:23, 24 January 2007 editFilll (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers34,790 edits →External links: Sorry skip at big sky penguin. I do not believe that this is the official teddy. Plus it looks fake and sleezy← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:48, 26 January 2007 edit undo66.47.51.78 (talk) update Steve countNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| __TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
| == Overview == | == Overview == | ||
| The project was named in honor of the ] ]. Eminent scientists on the list include ] (who, like Gould, is so eminent that he has appeared on ] <ref></ref>) as well as both ]-winning Steves in science, ] and ]. The provides an updated total, and numbers |
The project was named in honor of the ] ]. Eminent scientists on the list include ] (who, like Gould, is so eminent that he has appeared on ] <ref></ref>) as well as both ]-winning Steves in science, ] and ]. The provides an updated total, and numbers 785 Steves as of ], ].<ref></ref> | ||
| The signed statement reads: | The signed statement reads: | ||
Revision as of 18:48, 26 January 2007
Project Steve is a list of scientists with the name Stephen or a variation thereof (e.g., Stephanie, Stefan, Esteban, etc.) who "support evolution". It is produced by the National Center for Science Education as a "tongue-in-cheek parody" of creationist attempts to collect a list of scientists who "doubt evolution", poking fun at such endeavors in a "light-hearted" manner to make it clear that "We did not wish to mislead the public into thinking that scientific issues are decided by who has the longer list of scientists!" However, at the same time the project is a genuine collection of scientists, and despite its restriction to only scientists with names like "Steve", which the organizers claim restricts the list to roughly 1% of the total population, it is longer and contains many more eminent scientists (and in particular biologists) than any creationist list.
Overview
The project was named in honor of the paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould. Eminent scientists on the list include Stephen Hawking (who, like Gould, is so eminent that he has appeared on The Simpsons ) as well as both Nobel Prize-winning Steves in science, Steven Chu and Steven Weinberg. The "Steve-o-meter" provides an updated total, and numbers 785 Steves as of January 26, 2007.
The signed statement reads:
Evolution is a vital, well-supported, unifying principle of the biological sciences, and the scientific evidence is overwhelmingly in favor of the idea that all living things share a common ancestry. Although there are legitimate debates about the patterns and processes of evolution, there is no serious scientific doubt that evolution occurred or that natural selection is a major mechanism in its occurrence. It is scientifically inappropriate and pedagogically irresponsible for creationist pseudoscience, including but not limited to "intelligent design," to be introduced into the science curricula of our nation's public schools.
The NCSE also produces a T-shirt which includes in large letters: "Over _00 Scientists named Steve Agree, Teach Evolution!" where the blank contains the most recent hundreds mark. In 2004, Eugenie C. Scott, Glenn Branch and Nick Matzke published an article in the Annals of Improbable Research (with all the Steves signed to that point listed as co-authors) called The Morphology of Steve which contained "the first scientific analysis of the sex, geographic location, and body size of scientists named Steve". The data were obtained using NCSE's "pioneering experimental steveometry apparatus" - the t-shirt.
William Dembski, fellow of the Discovery Institute, whose "Scientific Dissent from Darwinism" petition has four Steves has said that " If Project Steve was meant to show that a considerable majority of the scientific community accepts a naturalistic conception of evolution, then the National Center for Science Education (NCSE) could have saved its energies -- that fact was never in question. The more interesting question was whether any serious scientists reject a naturalistic conception of evolution".
Inspired by Project Steve, and motivated by media coverage of the Discovery Institute's A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism during the Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District case, R. Joe Brandon initiated a four-day, word-of-mouth petition of scientists in support of evolution in October 2005. During the four-day drive A Scientific Support For Darwinism And For Public Schools Not To Teach Intelligent Design As Science gathered 7733 signatories verifiable as scientists. During the four days of the petition, it received 20 times as many signatures at a rate 690,000% higher than the Discovery Institute can claim.
See also
- A Scientific Dissent from Darwinism
- A Scientific Support for Darwinism
- Clergy Letter Project, a signed statement by 10,000 Christian clergy members rejecting Creationism.
- Flying Spaghetti Monster
- Evidence of evolution
- Level of support for evolution
References
- NCSE Project Steve
- "Project Steve FAQs".
- Hawking is Steve #300
- Steve-o-meter
- Eugenie C. Scott, Nick Matzke, Glenn Branch; et al. (2004). "The Morphology of Steve" (PDF). Annals of Improbable Research. 10 (4): 24–29.
{{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in:|author=(help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - Scientific Dissent from Darwinism from the Discovery Institute
- Project Steve - Establishing the Obvious William Dembski, Discovery Institute.
- PrNewsWire Oct, 2005
External links
- Project Steve main page
- Talk.Origins page on Project Steve
- The science show - Transcript of executive director of the National Center for Science Education Eugenie Scott, talking to science journalist and radio broadcaster Robyn Williams about Project Steve.