Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 04:56, 20 July 2021

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Green New Deal article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 3 months

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Economics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Environment: Sustainability Low‑importance This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Misplaced Pages:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Sustainability task force. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Climate change High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Finance & Investment Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. International relations Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Politics Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Green New Deal. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Green New Deal at the Reference desk.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Please consult the procedures and edit carefully.

Archives

Index Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present.

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 June 2021 and 31 July 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): CEGarcia001, ArmanKaur11 (article contribs).

Section organization of AOC plan and Biden plan and miscellaneous minor corrections

(1) Should the sections about the AOC plan and the Biden plan relating to the Green New Deal not be subsections of the United States section instead of subsections of the By country or region section? Given that the AOC plan has such extensive currently sub-subsection coverage in this article that would not be covered in the index if the current AOC plan subsection was a sub-subsection of the currently placed United States subsection, should each country just be its own section (Australia as section 3, Canada as section 4, the EU as section 5, etc) and not a subsection of the By country or region section so that the United States section could contain the AOC plan as a subsection and all of the AOC plan’s current sub-subsections as instead sub-subsections of the United States section within the AOC plan subsection? For clarity, this is my proposed organization of this article’s sections:

  1 History
     1.1 Proposals to include the Green New Deal in recovery program from COVID-19
  2 Environmental justice
  3 Australia
  4 Canada
  5 European Union
  6 South Korea
  7 United Kingdom
  8 United States
     8.1 Early efforts
     8.2 The Rep. Ocasio-Cortez and Sen. Markey Green New Deal
        8.2.1 Background
        8.2.2 Green New Deal Resolution
        8.2.3 House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis
        8.2.4 January 2019 letter to Congress from environmental groups
        8.2.5 Criticism
        8.2.6 Supporters
        8.2.7 Detractors
        8.2.8 Legislative outcome
        8.2.9 2020 Presidential Campaign
     8.3 The Biden climate plan
  9 See also
  10 References
  11 External links
     11.1 Projects referred to as "Green New Deal"
     11.2 Green New Deal proposal in 116th Congress

This organization of sections would match the precedent of section followed by articles such as 2020 United States Senate elections where the discussion of how the topic is applied over a geographic region is given its own section instead of being a subsection of a theoretical section called By state such as how this article creates a section called By country or region. This reorganization would place the AOC plan and the Biden plan relating to the Green New Deal under the United States section where they should go instead of the current section organization that seems to imply that the AOC plan and the Biden plan are countries or regions.

(2) In section 3.7.8 of the current article (section 8.2.9 in my proposal of the section organization), the title is currently misspelled as "Legistrative outcome". It should say "Legislative outcome".

(3) There is an unnecessary extra line break between the Biden plan section and the See also section that should be deleted. I would do all of these things if I could edit this article.

Nicolás Macri (talk) 19:45, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Done. Thanks so much for taking the time to clearly specify those excellent improvements. FeydHuxtable (talk) 09:23, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Democrat leader council labeled conservative?

Article labels Dlc conservative. Not supported by cited article. Center-left would be better description.

Read further and American Action Network called center-right. Am very confused how DLC and PPI were listed as conservative in this and AAN was called center-right.

If you examine the articles on these three groups, the characterizations are quite accurate. The Democratic Leadership Council is the conservative pro-corporate (they claim to be "moderate") Democratic establishment group; the Progressive Policy Institute is their think tank. (By global standards, there is no center-left in the American Democratic Party.) And the American Action Network is a moderate (i.e., center-right) Republican group. --Orange Mike | Talk 12:50, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

By that standard the AAN would almost certainly be considered a far right group as a brief visit to their website clearly shows.

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 15 July 2021

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Add a section to the "Green New Deal Resolution" sub-article as follows:

On April 20, 2021, Rep. Ocasio-Cortez and Sen. Markey reintroduced the Green New Deal Resolution at the National Mall. The resolution reaffirms the threat produced by climate change and the responsibility of the US to recommit to meeting the emission goals outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Also, to add a section to the "The Biden climate plan" sub-article as follows:

President Biden’s infrastructure package, which pledges to halve the U.S. greenhouse gas emissions by 2030, has been criticized by progressives, including Rep. Ocasio-Cortez, as not being ambitious enough to achieve the scale required to mitigate climate change. Biden’s climate plan also outlined an American Jobs and Families Plan, which would lead to the creation of a Civilian Climate Corps.

Sandbox page: https://en.wikipedia.org/User:CEGarcia001/Green_New_Deal?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template CEGarcia001 (talk) 00:31, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Done , allthough I added a new L3 section for the re-introduction, otherwise it might not be clear that various earlier sections refer just to the original AOC & Markey GND. Thanks for drafting these useful updates. FeydHuxtable (talk) 01:32, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 20 July 2021

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

The Global Green New Deal, under United Nations Environment Programme and United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, expands the New Deal policies of President Roosevelt by emphasizing a more global and sustainable approach (Reference 1). The Global Green Deal introduces the idea of an an economy that is globally inclusive yet also collectively mitigating climate change (Reference 2).

The United Nations pushes to achieve this goal by encouraging investment in renewable energy at a global level which will be helpful in creating new jobs, increasing economic output, and fighting climate change (reference 3). In addition, United Nations advocates for its G20 members to invest in additional sectors that promote environmental health while also providing financial assistance to other developing countries (Reference 4).

References:

1.United Nations. “UN-DESA Policy Brief No. 12.” United Nations- Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Mar. 2009, sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/policybrief12.pdf. 2. Gallagher, Kevin P., and Richard Kozul-Wright. “A New Multilateralism for Shared Prosperity.” United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, unctad.org/system/files/official-document/gp_ggnd_2019_en.pdf. 3.United Nations. “A Global Green New Deal for Climate, Energy, and Development.” United Nations- Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Dec. 2009, sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/cc_global_green_new_deal.pdf. 4. United Nations. “Global Green New Deal.” UN Environment Programme , Sept. 2009, wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/7736/-Global%20Green%20New%20Deal_%20An%20Update%20for%20the%20G20%20Pittsburgh%20Summit-2009880.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y. ArmanKaur11 (talk) 04:54, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

1. "SENATOR MARKEY AND REPRESENTATIVE OCASIO-CORTEZ REINTRODUCE GREEN NEW DEAL RESOLUTION". markey.senate.gov. Retrieved 14 July 2021.
2. Frazin, Rachel. "Overnight Energy: Biden reportedly will pledge to halve US emissions by 2030". TheHill. Retrieved 14 July 2021. {{cite web}}: Text "Ocasio-Cortez, Markey reintroduce Green New Deal resolution" ignored (help)
3. Kurtzleben, Danielle. "Ocasio-Cortez Sees Green New Deal Progress In Biden Plan, But 'It's Not Enough'". npr. Retrieved 14 July 2021.
4. Segers, Grace. "Green New Deal advocates see imprint on Biden's climate agenda". cbsnews. Retrieved 14 July 2021.

• All unassessed articles
• C-Class Economics articles
• Low-importance Economics articles
• WikiProject Economics articles
• C-Class Environment articles
• Low-importance Environment articles
• Sustainability task force articles
• C-Class Climate change articles
• High-importance Climate change articles
• WikiProject Climate change articles
• C-Class Finance & Investment articles
• Mid-importance Finance & Investment articles
• WikiProject Finance & Investment articles
• C-Class International relations articles
• Mid-importance International relations articles
• WikiProject International relations articles
• C-Class politics articles
• Mid-importance politics articles
• WikiProject Politics articles
• C-Class United States articles
• Low-importance United States articles
• C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
• WikiProject United States articles