| Revision as of 16:33, 26 January 2007 editPete K (talk | contribs)3,760 edits I think we've decided they are definitely Waldorf cheerleaders and therefore unreliable sources.← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:31, 27 January 2007 edit undoPete K (talk | contribs)3,760 edits Resolved - Less filling AND tastes great.Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| This To Do box is only for controversial issues that still need to be to be resolved - see ] for more information. Once an item has resolved please strike out using '''<nowiki><strike></nowiki>''' function. | This To Do box is only for controversial issues that still need to be to be resolved - see ] for more information. Once an item has resolved please strike out using '''<nowiki><strike></nowiki>''' function. | ||
| *Waldorf schools = religious or spiritual? | *<s>Waldorf schools = religious or spiritual?</s> | ||
| *<strike>Do we want a section on alleged teaching about Lucifer?</strike> | *<strike>Do we want a section on alleged teaching about Lucifer?</strike> | ||
| **New Lucifer/Ahriman section in Antrhoposophy | **New Lucifer/Ahriman section in Antrhoposophy | ||
Revision as of 03:31, 27 January 2007
This To Do box is only for controversial issues that still need to be to be resolved - see here for more information. Once an item has resolved please strike out using <strike> function.
Waldorf schools = religious or spiritual?Do we want a section on alleged teaching about Lucifer?- New Lucifer/Ahriman section in Antrhoposophy
- New question is do we
haveneedhave sources for the influence of Lucifer on teaching?
- New question is do we
- New Lucifer/Ahriman section in Antrhoposophy
Add section about the temperaments.Is Petrash/Barnes an acceptable source, and if so to back up what sort of information?Add a Waldorf criticism section.- Add other sections to criticism section - currently only Racism