Misplaced Pages

Template:911ct: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:41, 27 January 2007 editNuclearUmpf (talk | contribs)3,904 edits correct title?← Previous edit Revision as of 14:46, 27 January 2007 edit undoTom harrison (talk | contribs)Administrators47,534 edits restore correct titleNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
<noinclude> <noinclude>
==9/11 conspiracy theories==
==Controlled demolition hypothesis for the collapse of the World Trade Center==


<noinclude>The template is intended to make no comment on any of the articles linked to. Its role is solely to assist navigation by researchers who wish to find articles on this topic with ease. <noinclude>The template is intended to make no comment on any of the articles linked to. Its role is solely to assist navigation by researchers who wish to find articles on this topic with ease.
Line 10: Line 10:
{{tfd|911ct}} {{tfd|911ct}}
{| class="toccolours" style="margin: 0 2em 0 2em;" {| class="toccolours" style="margin: 0 2em 0 2em;"
| align="center" style="background:#ccccff" width="100%" colspan="2"|<div class="plainlinks" style="width: 100%; text-align: right; font-size: smaller; margin: 0; padding: 0; height: 0"><nowiki><nowiki>]</nowiki></div>''']<br>Controlled demolition hypothesis, proponents & supporters, and popular culture''' | align="center" style="background:#ccccff" width="100%" colspan="2"|<div class="plainlinks" style="width: 100%; text-align: right; font-size: smaller; margin: 0; padding: 0; height: 0"><nowiki><nowiki>]</nowiki></div>''']<br>Conspiracy theories, hypotheses, proponents & supporters, and popular culture'''
|- |-
| align="center" halign="top" | Theory | align="center" halign="top" | Theories
|- |-
| valign="left" align=center halign="top" style="font-size: smaller" | ] | valign="left" align=center halign="top" style="font-size: smaller" | ]
|-
| valign="left" align=center halign="top" style="font-size: smaller" |]
|- |-
| align="center" halign="top" | Proponents and supporters | align="center" halign="top" | Proponents and supporters

Revision as of 14:46, 27 January 2007

9/11 conspiracy theories

The template is intended to make no comment on any of the articles linked to. Its role is solely to assist navigation by researchers who wish to find articles on this topic with ease.

When adding articles to the template please do so in alphabetical order. When adding an article to the template do not forget to add the template to the article. Simply add {{911ct}} directly above the categories the article is part of.


This template must be substituted. Replace {{Template for discussion ...}} with {{subst:Template for discussion ...}}.

9/11 conspiracy theories
Conspiracy theories, hypotheses, proponents & supporters, and popular culture
Theories
Controlled demolition hypothesis for the collapse of the World Trade Center
Proponents and supporters
Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed | Kevin Barrett | Robert M. Bowman | Andreas von Bülow | James H. Fetzer | David Ray Griffin | Sander Hicks | Jim Hoffman | Alex Jones | Steven E. Jones | Thierry Meyssan | Michael Ruppert | Peter Dale Scott | Webster G. Tarpley | Barrie Zwicker
Groups
9/11 Citizens Watch | Scholars for 9/11 Truth
Visual media
Dust to Dust: The Health Effects of 9/11 | Fahrenheit 9/11 | 9/11 Guilt: The Proof is in Your Hands | 911: In Plane Site | Loose Change | 9/11: Press for Truth
Books
9/11: The Big Lie | The CIA and September 11 | The New Pearl Harbor | The Terror Timeline | The War on Freedom


This template is intended to be deployed at the foot of the various 9/11 articles that do not favour the official explanation, and on article pages of people and organisations who are proponents of, or are linked in some manner with, such articles. Popular culture references are to (eg) TV shows where the existence of such a theory is fundamental to the show/edition and is "taken as read" to exist.

Categories: