Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
The ] held its caucus (a non-binding straw poll which has no impact on choosing delegates) on February 25, 2020. ] won the caucuses with 81.25% of the vote, however the delegates apportioned will be determined at the state convention in June.<ref name=dariowinsmn>{{cite web|url=https://www.mngreens.org/dario_hunter_wins_green_party_of_minnesota_presidential_caucus|title=Dario Hunter Wins Green Party of Minnesota Presidential Caucus |last1=Crews |first1=Trahern |publisher=]|date=March 1, 2020|access-date=March 1, 2020}}</ref>
The ] held its caucus (a non-binding straw poll which has no impact on choosing delegates) on February 25, 2020. ] won the caucuses with 81.25% of the vote, however the delegates apportioned will be determined at the state convention in June.<ref name=dariowinsmn>{{cite web|url=https://www.mngreens.org/dario_hunter_wins_green_party_of_minnesota_presidential_caucus|title=Dario Hunter Wins Green Party of Minnesota Presidential Caucus |last1=Crews |first1=Trahern |publisher=]|date=March 1, 2020|access-date=March 1, 2020}}</ref>
The caucus used ]. However, Hunter won in the first round.<ref name=dariowinsmn/>
The caucus used ]. However, Hunter won in the first round.<ref name=dariowinsmn/>
This article is missing information about Contests held after May 30 2020. Please expand the article to include this information. Further details may exist on the talk page. (July 2020)
The Green Party of Minnesota held its caucus (a non-binding straw poll which has no impact on choosing delegates) on February 25, 2020. Dario Hunter won the caucuses with 81.25% of the vote, however the delegates apportioned will be determined at the state convention in June.
The Massachusetts Secretary of State officially declared Hunter the winner as he was the candidate with the most votes. Nonetheless, the 'no preference' votes exceeded the votes of all candidates.
The number of delegates apportioned is calculated by the percentage of votes received. Votes not cast for a “surviving candidate” or a candidate that received less than 14% of total votes cast, become uncommitted. As a result a single delegate was awarded to uncommitted.
This primary was conducted under a system in which each person approve of more than one candidate per ballot, therefore votes reflect total number of ballots that approved of the candidate, and as a result reflect more approvals than ballots cast.
This primary was conducted under a system in which each person approve of more than one candidate per ballot, therefore percentages reflect the percentage of voters that approved of each candidate, and as a result do not add up to 100%.
This primary was conducted under a system in which each person approve of more than one candidate per ballot, therefore total reflects the number of ballots cast, not the number of approvals on all ballots.
This primary was conducted under a system in which each person could cast a vote for more than one candidate, therefore percentages reflect the percentage of voters that approved of each candidate, and as a result do not add up to 100%.
This primary was conducted under a system in which each person could cast a vote for more than one candidate, therefore percentages reflect the percentage of voters that approved of each candidate, and as a result do not add up to 100%.
