Revision as of 13:24, 24 August 2021 editBbb23 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators270,870 edits →WP:RFPP: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:53, 24 August 2021 edit undoSuneye1 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers26,555 edits Ds alerts - Ds alert IPA (RW 16.1)Tags: RW contentious topics alertNext edit → | ||
Line 227: | Line 227: | ||
you filed at RFPP was meritless. No one has edited that article since July 28. If you don't know how to use administrator noticeboards properly, do not file reports at them.--] (]) 13:24, 24 August 2021 (UTC) | you filed at RFPP was meritless. No one has edited that article since July 28. If you don't know how to use administrator noticeboards properly, do not file reports at them.--] (]) 13:24, 24 August 2021 (UTC) | ||
==Discretionary Sanctions Notice== | |||
{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' | |||
You have shown interest in ], ], and ]. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called ] is in effect. Any administrator may impose ] on editors who do not strictly follow ], or the ], when making edits related to the topic. | |||
For additional information, please see the ] and the ] decision ]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. | |||
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> - ] 13:53, 24 August 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:53, 24 August 2021
Welcome
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Fearless And United Guards (October 31)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was: Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Misplaced Pages. You can find it and improve it at Fearless And United – Guards instead. The comment the reviewer left was: Article already exists, add the content there. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fearless And United Guards and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Misplaced Pages's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Fearless And United Guards, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Misplaced Pages's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
April 2021
Hello, I'm Padgriffin. I noticed that in this edit to Foreign relations of India, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Misplaced Pages with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Padgriffin 10:01, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
- Good afternoon! yesterday only, I took a dreaded and a long process of adding citations in China section, and now, it is removed. I'm very much unhappy, because it took me hours doing so, and now it was un done. Even the citatios in Nepal section were removed. Why?! Please don't do it, and revert back the changes.
- And of today's edit, you can keep it un done, but at least re-add the citations. That would be nice. Thank You! Have a good day. Utkarsh555 (talk) 10:23, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did with this edit to Foreign relations of India, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Padgriffin 10:04, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
- Ok, I'm sorry. I would work with proper net connection and fresh mind. But please re-do the captions in Nepal, China, and Pakistan section, as I did it with much of painstaken work. Please don't revert it and Let It Be. Please. Thank you.
- Have A Good Day! Utkarsh555 (talk) 10:29, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Consensus and fixing
What consensus is there for you to mass move all the India-country relations? And do you plan to fix the massive WP:MOSTITLE error you've created with your 50+ page moves? TAXIDICAE💰 13:42, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Also please do not move any more pages until you answer this question. TAXIDICAE💰 13:43, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry for my actions, if that hurts you. Actually, I'd been planning all these since a couple of months. Actually, the relations articles are based on their geographic locations. Countries located on left and up of India shall have their names before India, while countries having right and down positions geographically shall have the names 'after' India. That was all my target.
- Thank you.
- Have a nice day. Utkarsh555 (talk) 13:47, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- We already have a better convention, which is to list the two countries in alphabetical order. Please stop moving pages. You have also introduced unwanted and unbalanced spacing after the en dashes, which we will need to repair. Misplaced Pages has detailed guidance on article titles and dashes. If you think it would be useful to invent a new system, please discuss it with more experienced editors before rushing in to move pages from their established titles. Certes (talk) 15:03, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- Fine. If nobody hears me out, what can I do?
- I would sincerely like to get guidance from the masters, experts about topics, especially related.
- Come on, just think about it!
- I think I can help improving articles.
- By the way, please consider my counties' placement: If a country lies to the left, down or most of it to lie below Equator, then we can write it as "Country A-Country B relations". And if a Country is towards right, upwards or if the country lies fully or half of equator, the let the article's heading be "Country B-Country A relations.
- Thank You.
- Have a nice day. Utkarsh555 (talk) 09:34, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- We have given you guidance, though I don't claim to be a master. WikiProject International relations could give some more informed opinions, if you want to ask on their talk page. Certes (talk) 10:46, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- I'll just say,
- A BIG Thank You!
- And, have a nice day Utkarsh555 (talk) 10:49, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- We have given you guidance, though I don't claim to be a master. WikiProject International relations could give some more informed opinions, if you want to ask on their talk page. Certes (talk) 10:46, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- We already have a better convention, which is to list the two countries in alphabetical order. Please stop moving pages. You have also introduced unwanted and unbalanced spacing after the en dashes, which we will need to repair. Misplaced Pages has detailed guidance on article titles and dashes. If you think it would be useful to invent a new system, please discuss it with more experienced editors before rushing in to move pages from their established titles. Certes (talk) 15:03, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
India foreign relations article change
Hello, please do not change the name of articles for India's foreign relations. The names do not reflect their geographic position, rather they are in alphabetical order as per the standard for all foreign relations articles. Aquintero82, (talk), 28 April 2021, 07:03 (UTC)
Ok but atleast check Atlas or a map. I was doing according to that order. Please consider revision again. Thank you. Have a nice day!. Utkarsh555 (talk) 14:08, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
Page move
Hi. I noticed you recently moved the article Old (film) to Old (2021 film). Is there a reason why you added the year into the disambiguation? We typically only do this when there is more than one film of the same title, per WP:NCF. BOVINEBOY2008 12:33, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
- Agreed. Misplaced Pages has complex article title conventions, and it may be better to get help with any future moves by raising a requested move. Certes (talk) 13:11, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
June 2021
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:2020 Delhi riots, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 17:35, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Ekans: Ek Se Badhkar Snake (July 1)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was: This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Misplaced Pages article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Misplaced Pages. The comment the reviewer left was: This series has just been premiered. It is WP:TOOSOON for an article on it. Wait and see what independent media says about it after a few months. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ekans: Ek Se Badhkar Snake and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Misplaced Pages's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ekans: Ek Se Badhkar Snake, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Misplaced Pages's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, Utkarsh555! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Misplaced Pages where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:31, 1 July 2021 (UTC) |
July 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did at Ejen Ali The Movie: Mission Neo, you may be blocked from editing.
Your additions were removed as per WP:PLOTBLOAT - as per WP:FILMPLOT, plot summaries should be between 400 and 700 words - this plot is clearly tagged to be REDUCED in length, not increased
Even after removing your plotbloat it is 1703 words long - it still needs REDUCING by 60% +Template:Z188 - Arjayay (talk) 09:13, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Ekans: Ek Se Badhkar Snake for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ekans: Ek Se Badhkar Snake, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Ekans: Ek Se Badhkar Snake until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Embassy of Brazil, New Delhi moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Embassy of Brazil, New Delhi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Misplaced Pages). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Misplaced Pages's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 19:30, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Embassy of Brazil, New Delhi (August 12)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Calliopejen1 was: This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Misplaced Pages article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Misplaced Pages. The comment the reviewer left was: Might be better to cover at Brazil–India relations (add diplomatic missions section?) Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Embassy of Brazil, New Delhi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Misplaced Pages's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Embassy of Brazil, New Delhi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Misplaced Pages's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
August 2021
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages.
When editing Misplaced Pages, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
I noticed your recent edit to 2021 Taliban offensive does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
- User contributions
- Recent changes
- Watchlists
- Revision diffs
- IRC channels
- Related changes
- New pages list
- Article editing history
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Misplaced Pages account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Firestar464 (talk) 07:52, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Fall of Kabul (2021). This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Misplaced Pages. Thank you. intforce (talk) 02:01, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
WP:RFPP
This report you filed at RFPP was meritless. No one has edited that article since July 28. If you don't know how to use administrator noticeboards properly, do not file reports at them.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:24, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Discretionary Sanctions Notice
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.