Misplaced Pages

Talk:Dabhi: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:16, 27 June 2021 editOst316 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers86,784 editsm Ost316 moved page Draft talk:Dabhi Kolis to Talk:Dabhi Kolis: I don't know enough about this topic and it may not be an appropriate article, but it has a 10-year history, so I don't think that this qualifies, as it can become a backdoor route to deletion, per WP:DRAFTIFY. Additionally, page had more content until recent deletions, which may warrant discussion← Previous edit Revision as of 19:28, 25 August 2021 edit undoJohnsoniensis (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users720,824 edits add wpNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WPINDIA|class=|importance=}} {{WPINDIA|class=|importance=|gujarat=y}}


== Recent move == == Recent move ==

Revision as of 19:28, 25 August 2021

WikiProject iconIndia: Gujarat Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
???This article has not yet received a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Gujarat.

Recent move

This article was moved yesterday from Dabhi to Dabhi dynasty by Dangarwa (talk · contribs) without a rationale. Searching for sources I only get 2 Gbook hits using the term Dabhi dynasty. Why was the article moved? Sam Sailor 11:11, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Sourcing

Regarding this reinstatement of a large chunk of material, please note that the consensus is that sources from the British Raj era are not reliable. Furthermore, much of what was reinstated in that edit was completely unsourced - please read the information at WP:V. - Sitush (talk) 09:44, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Categories: