Misplaced Pages

Talk:Vitalism: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:12, 31 August 2021 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,303,661 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Vitalism/Archive 2) (bot← Previous edit Revision as of 00:38, 7 September 2021 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,303,661 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Vitalism/Archive 2) (botTag: ReplacedNext edit →
Line 20: Line 20:
}} }}
{{ArbComPseudoscience}} {{ArbComPseudoscience}}

== Yes. We ''are'' biased. ==
Jimmy Wales, founder of Misplaced Pages, once wrote:

:"'''Misplaced Pages’s policies''' ... '''are exactly spot-on and correct. If you can get your work published in respectable scientific journals – that is to say, if you can produce evidence through replicable scientific experiments, then Misplaced Pages will cover it appropriately.'''

:'''What we won’t do is pretend that the work of lunatic charlatans is the equivalent of 'true scientific discourse'. It isn’t.''' "

So yes, we ''are'' biased.

We are biased towards ] and biased against ].<br>
We are biased towards ], and biased against ].<ref> Talk page of Misplaced Pages article "Astrology". Archive 13, section "Bias against astrology"</ref><br>
We are biased towards ], and biased against ].<ref> Talk page of Misplaced Pages article "Alchemy". Archive 2, section "naturalistic_bias_in_article"</ref><br>
We are biased towards ], and biased against ].<ref> Talk page of Misplaced Pages article "Numerology". Archive 1, section "There's_more_work_to_be_done"</ref><br>
We are biased towards ], and biased against ].<ref> Talk page of Misplaced Pages article "Homeopathy". Archive 60, section "Wikipedia_Bias"</ref><br>
We are biased towards ], and biased against ].<ref> Talk page of Misplaced Pages article "Acupuncture". Archive 13, section "Strong_Bias_towards_Skeptic_Researchers"</ref><br>
We are biased towards ], and biased against ].<ref> Talk page of Misplaced Pages article "Energy_(esotericism)". Archive 1, section "Bias"</ref><br>
We are biased towards ] and biased against ].<ref> Talk page of Misplaced Pages article "Conspiracy_theory". Archive 12, section "Sequence_of_sections_and_bias"</ref><br>
We are biased towards ], and biased against ].<br>
We are biased towards ], and biased against ].<ref> Talk page of Misplaced Pages article "Vaccine_hesitancy". Archive 5, section "Clearly_a_bias_attack_article"</ref><br>
We are biased towards ], and biased against ].<ref> Talk page of Misplaced Pages article "Magnet_therapy". Archive 1, section "Contradiction_and_bias"</ref><br>
We are biased towards ], and biased against ].<ref> Talk page of Misplaced Pages article "Crop_circle". Archive 9, section "Bower_and_Chorley_Bias_Destroyed_by_Mathematician"</ref><br>
We are biased towards ], and biased against ].<ref> Talk page of Misplaced Pages article "Laundry ball". Archive 17</ref><br>
We are biased towards ], and biased against ].<br>
We are biased towards ], and biased against ].<br>
We are biased towards ] in ]s, and biased against ] in ].<ref> Talk page of Misplaced Pages article "Ayurveda". Archive 15, section "Suggestion_to_Shed_Biases"</ref><br>
We are biased towards ], and biased against ].<br>
We are biased towards ], and biased against ].<ref> Talk page of Misplaced Pages article "Torsion_field_(pseudoscience)". Archive 1, section "stop_f****_supressing_science_with_your_bias_bull****"</ref><br>
We are biased towards ], and biased against ].<ref> Talk page of Misplaced Pages article "Young_Earth_creationism". Archive 3, section "Biased_Article_(part_2)"</ref><br>
We are biased towards ], and biased against ].<ref> Talk page of Misplaced Pages article "Holocaust_denial". Archive 12, section "Blatant_bias_on_this_page"</ref><br>
We are biased towards the ], and biased against ].<ref> Talk page of Misplaced Pages article "Scientific_racism". Archive 1, section "THIS_is_propaganda"</ref><br>
We are biased towards the ], and biased against ].<ref> Talk page of Misplaced Pages article "Global_warming_conspiracy_theory". Archive 3, section "Problems_with_the_article"</ref><br>
We are biased towards ], and biased against ].<ref> Talk page of Misplaced Pages article "Flood_geology". Archive 4, section "Obvious_bias"</ref><br>
We are biased towards medical treatments that have been proven to be effective in ] ]s, and biased against medical treatments that are based upon ].<ref> Talk page of Misplaced Pages article "Quackery". Archive 1, section "POV_#2"</ref><br>
We are biased towards ], and biased against ].<ref> Talk page of Misplaced Pages article "Ancient_astronauts". Archive 4, section "Pseudoscience"</ref><br>
We are biased towards ], and biased against ].<br>
We are biased towards ], and biased against ].

And we are not going to change.
{{reflist-talk}}

-] (]) 00:33, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:38, 7 September 2021

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Vitalism article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months 
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconSkepticism Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconAlternative medicine
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Alternative medicine related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Alternative medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative medicineTemplate:WikiProject Alternative medicineAlternative medicine
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconPhilosophy Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Misplaced Pages.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconPsychology Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconMedicine Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconHistory of Science Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconBiology High‑importance
WikiProject iconVitalism is part of the WikiProject Biology, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to biology on Misplaced Pages. Leave messages on the WikiProject talk page.BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject BiologyTemplate:WikiProject BiologyBiology
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconChiropractic Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Chiropractic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chiropractic on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChiropracticWikipedia:WikiProject ChiropracticTemplate:WikiProject ChiropracticChiropractic
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to pseudoscience and fringe science, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Arbitration Ruling on the Treatment of Pseudoscience

In December of 2006 the Arbitration Committee ruled on guidelines for the presentation of topics as pseudoscience in Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Pseudoscience. The final decision was as follows:

  • Neutral point of view as applied to science: Misplaced Pages:Neutral point of view, a fundamental policy, requires fair representation of significant alternatives to scientific orthodoxy. Significant alternatives, in this case, refers to legitimate scientific disagreement, as opposed to pseudoscience.
  • Serious encyclopedias: Serious and respected encyclopedias and reference works are generally expected to provide overviews of scientific topics that are in line with respected scientific thought. Misplaced Pages aspires to be such a respected work.
  • Obvious pseudoscience: Theories which, while purporting to be scientific, are obviously bogus, such as Time Cube, may be so labeled and categorized as such without more justification.
  • Generally considered pseudoscience: Theories which have a following, such as astrology, but which are generally considered pseudoscience by the scientific community may properly contain that information and may be categorized as pseudoscience.
  • Questionable science: Theories which have a substantial following, such as psychoanalysis, but which some critics allege to be pseudoscience, may contain information to that effect, but generally should not be so characterized.
  • Alternative theoretical formulations: Alternative theoretical formulations which have a following within the scientific community are not pseudoscience, but part of the scientific process.
Categories: