Misplaced Pages

User talk:Supreme Deliciousness: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 09:40, 9 October 2021 view sourceDMacks (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators186,639 edits Unexplained "disputed" tag: new sectionTag: Reverted← Previous edit Revision as of 15:50, 9 October 2021 view source Supreme Deliciousness (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,595 edits Unexplained "disputed" tagTag: RevertedNext edit →
Line 16: Line 16:


The {{tl|disputed inline}} tag appears to be originated by you (I can't find that it had existed previor to ). But I don't see any explanation about what is disputed. Based on your preventing removal of the tag under 500/30 ARBPIA, I assume it's not something as simple as the mere fact of which cemetery and its GPS coordinates. Could you clarify what your concern is (or if there was a previous explained-but-unresolved concern raised by someone else)? ] (]) 09:40, 9 October 2021 (UTC) The {{tl|disputed inline}} tag appears to be originated by you (I can't find that it had existed previor to ). But I don't see any explanation about what is disputed. Based on your preventing removal of the tag under 500/30 ARBPIA, I assume it's not something as simple as the mere fact of which cemetery and its GPS coordinates. Could you clarify what your concern is (or if there was a previous explained-but-unresolved concern raised by someone else)? ] (]) 09:40, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
:The tag was added because someone added "Israel", after the occupied and disputed city of Jerusalem. The IP is therefor violating the 500/30 rule by removing the tag. If you take a look at ]s main page, it is presented as being disputed and the fringe Israeli pov is not presented as a fact. That same consensus should be used in other articles that mention Jerusalem. If someone would like to change this, they must open a new discussion at the main Jerusalem article and get a new consensus. --] (]) 15:50, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:50, 9 October 2021

/

Archives (Index)



This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Unexplained "disputed" tag

Hi Supreme,

The {{disputed inline}} tag appears to be originated by you (I can't find that it had existed previor to this edit). But I don't see any explanation about what is disputed. Based on your preventing removal of the tag under 500/30 ARBPIA, I assume it's not something as simple as the mere fact of which cemetery and its GPS coordinates. Could you clarify what your concern is (or if there was a previous explained-but-unresolved concern raised by someone else)? DMacks (talk) 09:40, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

The tag was added because someone added "Israel", after the occupied and disputed city of Jerusalem. The IP is therefor violating the 500/30 rule by removing the tag. If you take a look at Jerusalems main page, it is presented as being disputed and the fringe Israeli pov is not presented as a fact. That same consensus should be used in other articles that mention Jerusalem. If someone would like to change this, they must open a new discussion at the main Jerusalem article and get a new consensus. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 15:50, 9 October 2021 (UTC)