User talk:QuackGuru: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 17:08, 2 February 2007 editWoohookitty (talk \| contribs)Administrators611,228 edits →List of articles related to scientific skepticism ← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:14, 2 February 2007 edit undoValjean (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers95,332 edits list descriptionNext edit →
Line 18:		Line 18:
	:A good number of the votes didn't even mention that it was reposted content. If the deletion review also says that the article should be deleted, then I just don't think you have alot to stand on. That would be essentially 2 votes against you. I mean, if people in the deletion review say that the voting was ok and that the page should stay deleted, I don't see a whole lot of options for you. Recreating the article in any form similar to the one that has been deleted is just going to bring another deletion. --]<sup>]</sup> 17:05, 2 February 2007 (UTC)		:A good number of the votes didn't even mention that it was reposted content. If the deletion review also says that the article should be deleted, then I just don't think you have alot to stand on. That would be essentially 2 votes against you. I mean, if people in the deletion review say that the voting was ok and that the page should stay deleted, I don't see a whole lot of options for you. Recreating the article in any form similar to the one that has been deleted is just going to bring another deletion. --]<sup>]</sup> 17:05, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
	::It can be about whatever you think it's about, but for Misplaced Pages's purposes, the deletion review is about whether the deletion process was unfair. That's the whole point of the deletion review. As for posting a new article, you can do that in your user space, which starts as User:QuackGuru/name_of_article. Hope that makes sense. --]<sup>]</sup> 17:08, 2 February 2007 (UTC)		::It can be about whatever you think it's about, but for Misplaced Pages's purposes, the deletion review is about whether the deletion process was unfair. That's the whole point of the deletion review. As for posting a new article, you can do that in your user space, which starts as User:QuackGuru/name_of_article. Hope that makes sense. --]<sup>]</sup> 17:08, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

			== list description ==

			Right now your current description:

			* The following is a list of articles about criticisms of alternative medicine.

			doesn't fit well at all. Don't you mean something like:

			* The following is a list of articles about subjects that are often criticized by scientists, mainstream medicine, and skeptics.

			Just a thought. Do with it as you wish. It's your show and I'm not getting involved. You shouldn't be starting this in article space, but on your user space. Don't make your mistakes "in public", which happens when you have disabled your email. -- ] 23:14, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:14, 2 February 2007

Quack Talk: Discussion

Hello, and Welcome to the Misplaced Pages, QuackGuru! Thanks for creating the "List of articles related to quackery" article. Here are a few perfunctory tips to hasten your acculturation into the Misplaced Pages experience:

Take a look at the New contributors' help page, the Misplaced Pages Tutorial and the Manual of Style, and If you still need any help, you can always post your question at the Help Desk.
When you have time, please peruse The five pillars of Misplaced Pages and Assume good faith, but please keep in mind the unique style you brought to the Wiki!
Always be mindful of striving for NPOV, be respectful of others' POV, and remember your perspective on the meaning of neutrality is invaluable!
Explore, be bold in editing, and, above all else, have fun!

And some odds and ends: Cite your sources, Civility, Conflict resolution, How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Pages needing attention, Peer review, Policy Library, Verifiability, Village pump, and Wikiquette; also, you can sign your name on any page by typing four tildes: ~~~~. Best of luck, QuackGuru, and most importantly, have fun! Ombudsman 20:34, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. QuackGuru 07:11, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

List of articles related to scientific skepticism

Well, firstly, no one really "runs" Misplaced Pages. It's an open community. The founders of Misplaced Pages were Jimmy Wales (who is still relatively active) and Larry Sanger. There are around 1,000 administrators along with bureaucrats and the link. But there isn't really an owner. The community runs it as a group. If you want to pursue other options, that's your prerogative. But I'm tellin' ya. With a 14 to 1 vote on AfD (most of them being strong or speedy) and what's right now a 6 to 2 vote on DRV, I'm not sure there'd be much hope that anyone would overturn the deletion. And I'm not saying that just because I'm the deleting admin (and I wasn't even aware of the article before I saw the AfD nor am pro or anti scientific skepticism). I'm saying it because Misplaced Pages runs on consensus. It always has. And generally, Jimmy or admins or bureaucrats do not overturn consensus unless it's something particularly egregious such as someone deleting (not just closing) an AfD or a DRV discussion and the like. So. Feel free to do what you think is best but having been here for 2 years, I can tell you that the odds are pretty long that someone will overturn the decision to delete. I would not have closed the discussion if I felt like it had any chance not to pass as a deletion. --Woohookitty 16:50, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

A good number of the votes didn't even mention that it was reposted content. If the deletion review also says that the article should be deleted, then I just don't think you have alot to stand on. That would be essentially 2 votes against you. I mean, if people in the deletion review say that the voting was ok and that the page should stay deleted, I don't see a whole lot of options for you. Recreating the article in any form similar to the one that has been deleted is just going to bring another deletion. --Woohookitty 17:05, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

It can be about whatever you think it's about, but for Misplaced Pages's purposes, the deletion review is about whether the deletion process was unfair. That's the whole point of the deletion review. As for posting a new article, you can do that in your user space, which starts as User:QuackGuru/name_of_article. Hope that makes sense. --Woohookitty 17:08, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

list description

Right now your current description:

The following is a list of articles about criticisms of alternative medicine.

doesn't fit well at all. Don't you mean something like:

The following is a list of articles about subjects that are often criticized by scientists, mainstream medicine, and skeptics.

Just a thought. Do with it as you wish. It's your show and I'm not getting involved. You shouldn't be starting this in article space, but on your user space. Don't make your mistakes "in public", which happens when you have disabled your email. -- Fyslee 23:14, 2 February 2007 (UTC)