Misplaced Pages

Talk:Insight on the News: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:22, 3 February 2007 editDogru144 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users30,941 edits importance of NY Times references  Revision as of 13:23, 3 February 2007 edit undoDogru144 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users30,941 edits signed referenceNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
==Importance of retaining NY Times references== ==Importance of retaining NY Times references==
The link to the NY Times article are essential, so that readers can see the truth beyond this story. And the links are to keep wikipedia with verifiable documentation, otherwise, reference-less articles are no better than Insight's sourceless accusations. Dogru144 13:19, 3 February 2007 (UTC) The link to the NY Times article are essential, so that readers can see the truth beyond this story. And the links are to keep wikipedia with verifiable documentation, otherwise, reference-less articles are no better than Insight's sourceless accusations. ] 13:23, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:23, 3 February 2007

Importance of retaining NY Times references

The link to the NY Times article are essential, so that readers can see the truth beyond this story. And the links are to keep wikipedia with verifiable documentation, otherwise, reference-less articles are no better than Insight's sourceless accusations. Dogru144 13:23, 3 February 2007 (UTC)