Revision as of 21:28, 8 November 2021 editAlssa1 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,594 edits →Webbe & SCG← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:09, 19 November 2021 edit undo2401:4900:5044:de12:a487:6b00:46d4:795d (talk) →Propoganda editing: new sectionTags: Mobile edit Mobile web editNext edit → | ||
Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
:{{u|Alssa1}} you want to retain it but provide no examples despite saying they exist; me and A N Other explained why it is a poor idea. Consensus would trump BRD anyway. - ] (]) 21:02, 8 November 2021 (UTC) | :{{u|Alssa1}} you want to retain it but provide no examples despite saying they exist; me and A N Other explained why it is a poor idea. Consensus would trump BRD anyway. - ] (]) 21:02, 8 November 2021 (UTC) | ||
::"''you want to retain it but provide no examples despite saying they exist''" Can you explain what is in '''''' exactly if I didn't provide any examples? ] (]) 21:28, 8 November 2021 (UTC) | ::"''you want to retain it but provide no examples despite saying they exist''" Can you explain what is in '''''' exactly if I didn't provide any examples? ] (]) 21:28, 8 November 2021 (UTC) | ||
== Propoganda editing == | |||
Hi sir this person https://en.m.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/RS6784 is always editing Misplaced Pages for his Pro-Rajput caste and Anti-Gurjar / Anti-Ahir propoganda. Please see his edits. ] (]) 08:09, 19 November 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:09, 19 November 2021
An editor thinks something might be wrong with this page. They can't be arsed to fix it, but can rest assured that they've done their encyclopedic duty by sticking on a tag. Please allow this tag to languish indefinitely at the top of the page, since nobody knows exactly what the tagging editor was worked up about. |
Archives |
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Caste promotion account
Hello, please look at this user he is editing majority particular caste related articles and is heavily using doubtful references. He is Rajput promoting account only. Check his contributions.
War article without any authentic source
Please once see this Battle of Mandan page. Not a single source looks credible. 2 out of 3 the sources are even low rated on Google books and one is by a caste historian.
References
1) Hooja, Rima (2006). A History of Rajasthan. Rupa and company.
2) Sinh, Ranbir (2001). History of Shekhawats. p. 280.
3) Meharda, B.L. Territory, Polity, and Status- A Study of Shekhawats.
Here 1st source is from some Rupa company, other 2 are from caste writers not credible historians.
This whole article is a propoganda against reality. Please User:Sitush check it.
Need input
Hi there Sitush. It seems that you are busy but your participation at Talk:Breast tax#Redirect is needed. An affirmation of position on the subject is needed for emerging consensus. Thank you. Azuredivay (talk) 15:02, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Boo!
Happy Halloween!Hello Sitush:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Misplaced Pages, and have a happy and enjoyable Halloween!
—usernamekiran • sign the guestbook • (talk) 18:58, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Webbe & SCG
You seem to have reverted my reversion without following BRD or reviewing the talkpage, why is this? Alssa1 (talk) 22:56, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
- Alssa1 you want to retain it but provide no examples despite saying they exist; me and A N Other explained why it is a poor idea. Consensus would trump BRD anyway. - Sitush (talk) 21:02, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- "you want to retain it but provide no examples despite saying they exist" Can you explain what is in this edit exactly if I didn't provide any examples? Alssa1 (talk) 21:28, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Propoganda editing
Hi sir this person https://en.m.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/RS6784 is always editing Misplaced Pages for his Pro-Rajput caste and Anti-Gurjar / Anti-Ahir propoganda. Please see his edits. 2401:4900:5044:DE12:A487:6B00:46D4:795D (talk) 08:09, 19 November 2021 (UTC)