| Revision as of 05:37, 25 November 2021 editMathglot (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors86,810 edits →Please provide attribution when copying within Misplaced Pages: See WP:CWW.← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:13, 28 November 2021 edit undoRed-tailed hawk (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators32,702 edits Notification: listing of Legal successor (property) at WP:Articles for deletion.Tag: TwinkleNext edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| : <code>Copied content from ]; see that page's history for attribution.</code> | : <code>Copied content from ]; see that page's history for attribution.</code> | ||
| Thanks, ] (]) 05:37, 25 November 2021 (UTC) | Thanks, ] (]) 05:37, 25 November 2021 (UTC) | ||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="afd-notice"> | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. | |||
| <!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> — ] (]) 06:13, 28 November 2021 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:13, 28 November 2021
Please provide attribution when copying within Misplaced Pages
Hi Loew; thanks for your comments at my Talk page regarding Stereotypes of Jews. What you say makes sense, and removing the unsourced material at Jewish nose looks like a good move, so thanks for that.
One thing you mentioned needs to be discussed, though, which is providing attribution when copying within Misplaced Pages. In your comments on my page, where you said, "I merely copied a piece from ". Presumably, you are talking about this edit, of 9:56, 19 November 2021. It's perfectly okay to copy material from one Misplaced Pages article to another, so that edit where you copied from the other article is just fine.
However, there is one requirement that goes along with it: whenever you copy (or translate) material from another Misplaced Pages article, you must provide attribution in the edit summary of the edit where you add the material. This is based on Misplaced Pages's licensing requirements, and is explained at WP:Copying within Misplaced Pages.
You already reverted that edit, so I don't think it matters in this case, but going forward, when you copy material from another article, please be sure to attribute it in the edit summary. You can use this model, and paste it into the edit summary next time:
Copied content from ]; see that page's history for attribution.
Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 05:37, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Legal successor (property) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Legal successor (property) is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Legal successor (property) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.