| Revision as of 15:08, 5 February 2007 editBill Clark (talk | contribs)529 edits Public Utility links← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:46, 5 February 2007 edit undoWerdan7 (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers4,464 edits Your usernameNext edit → | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| I notice that you've started removing the public utility links from pages I've added them to. Please hold off on doing that until we get more feedback from any of the various locations this is being discussed. I understand that you disagree with me regarding the appropriateness of these links, which is why it's important for us to get feedback first. Thanks, --] 15:08, 5 February 2007 (UTC) | I notice that you've started removing the public utility links from pages I've added them to. Please hold off on doing that until we get more feedback from any of the various locations this is being discussed. I understand that you disagree with me regarding the appropriateness of these links, which is why it's important for us to get feedback first. Thanks, --] 15:08, 5 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
| == Your username == | |||
| ==Your Username ({{BASEPAGENAME}})== | |||
| Hello ''{{BASEPAGENAME}}'', thank you for your contributions. Misplaced Pages has a ] on what usernames editors can use. Unfortunately, concerns have been raised that your username may be ] with that policy. {{{1|}}} You can contribute to the discussion about it ]. Alternatively, if you agree that your username may be problematic and are willing to change it, it is possible for you to keep your present contributions history under a new name. Simply request a new name ] following the guidelines on that page. Thank you. <!-- Template:UsernameDiscussion -->--]<sup>] ]</sup> 22:46, 5 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:46, 5 February 2007
Links to commercial sites
(From User_talk:Bill Clark)
You will find a primary guideline to review at Misplaced Pages:External_links#Links_normally_to_be_avoided. Spamreporter1 12:51, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- I don't think I've violated that guideline, so I'm not sure what the problem is. I only added external links in a few cases (and not in the example cited here), and those were to community websites (not commercial) for those cities. In most of the cases, I simply added a wikilink in the "Economy/Public utilities" section indicating that Northland was the cable provider for that city, and/or a reference/citation for that fact.
- Since my intention was to do the same for a large number of other cable companies, I'd like to get this cleared up before I proceed further. Is the problem with the wikilinks in the "Economy/Public utilities" section, the few external links, the citations, or something else? I'll be happy to change my plans, but need to have a clear idea of what's expected. Is there a better (more inclusive) place to discuss this, where I might get more input?
- Thanks, --Bill Clark 14:56, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
NOTE: Please see the main discussion at VP/A and post any follow-ups there. --Bill Clark 19:11, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
RE:WikiProject bot pop
No, I am not trying to populate the WikiProjects with bots, I am trying to get bots to put the WikiProject's template on article talk pages. - Patricknoddy (talk · contribs) 1:33pm, February 4, 2007
- I have responded here, Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject. - Patricknoddy (talk · contribs) 2:01pm, February 4, 2007
Public Utility links
I notice that you've started removing the public utility links from pages I've added them to. Please hold off on doing that until we get more feedback from any of the various locations this is being discussed. I understand that you disagree with me regarding the appropriateness of these links, which is why it's important for us to get feedback first. Thanks, --Bill Clark 15:08, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Your username
Your Username (Spamreporter1)
Hello Spamreporter1, thank you for your contributions. Misplaced Pages has a policy on what usernames editors can use. Unfortunately, concerns have been raised that your username may be incompatible with that policy. You can contribute to the discussion about it here. Alternatively, if you agree that your username may be problematic and are willing to change it, it is possible for you to keep your present contributions history under a new name. Simply request a new name here following the guidelines on that page. Thank you. --Werdan7 22:46, 5 February 2007 (UTC)