| Revision as of 21:50, 26 November 2021 editRp2006 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers14,879 edits →top: added project for this - possibly a cult← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:57, 12 December 2021 edit undoBigfreakingkelleher (talk | contribs)16 edits →Sections of this article read like they were written by someone with personal involvement: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
| * ]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2021-03-28T08:35:47.194493 | Sanshokuki2.svg --> | * ]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2021-03-28T08:35:47.194493 | Sanshokuki2.svg --> | ||
| Participate in the deletion discussion at the ]. —] (]) 08:35, 28 March 2021 (UTC) | Participate in the deletion discussion at the ]. —] (]) 08:35, 28 March 2021 (UTC) | ||
| == Sections of this article read like they were written by someone with personal involvement == | |||
| This applies to other sections, but the most prominent one in my mind is the one that reads: | |||
| "Soka Gakkai has long been a subject of criticism in the Japanese weekly tabloid news/magazine press. Press criticism of the Soka Gakkai should be seen against the backdrop of negative press coverage of new religious movements in general. It is important to understand that Japanese journalism is unlike that of the West. Scholars point out that less than two percent of journalists in Japan have degrees in journalism. That plus feeble libel laws leave little recourse for the victims of malicious defamation. Associate Professor of Religion at Hamilton College, Richard Seager writes that it is time to cease being overly intrigued by the Soka Gakkai’s history of controversy. “Over the course of a relatively short period, the Soka Gakkai moved from the margins of Japanese society into its mainstream.”" | |||
| This seems like way too much analysis for an encyclopedia entry. I'd trim this down to something like: | |||
| "Soka Gakkai has been subject to criticism in Japanese weekly tabloid news/magazine press, but current scholarship shows them being more in the mainstream of Japanese society than in its margins." | |||
| ] (]) 17:57, 12 December 2021 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:57, 12 December 2021
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Soka Gakkai article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23Auto-archiving period: 40 days  |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
 | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
Flag
The flag shown is the wrong flag. This: Sanshokuki2 Is the proper flag. I can't make the edit because it locked
Links
Not sure we want to include new links to pages that are being evaluated for their validity. The pages related to Nichiren Shoshu and Taisekiji are largely unsourced "original research"; or the citations are to the subject's own websites - both violations of WP policy. --Daveler16 (talk) 04:20, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
Once again Daveler, you are wrong. Regarding Article 23, you stated that all vehement criticisms of the Nichiren Shoshu are from the past. Here is an up to date SGI 2019 website, https://nichiren.com/eng/index.php/news/ in which SGI takes apart the Nichiren Shoshu 2602:306:CC5C:C1A9:40E3:BBE6:7162:7932 (talk) 01:41, 20 April 2020 (UTC) Mark R. Rogow
Removed picture
A pic of a Gohonzon was added directly under the pic of the Gohonzon that's already here. As there is no need for it, and no need to specify who transcribed it or to use the Japanese word for "altar", I removed it.--Daveler16 (talk) 16:57, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
Butsudan and altar and not exactly synonymous. A butsudan is the box that holds a gohonzon. The altar is the broader setup. Secondly the transcriber of the Gohonzon is important because it was a signficant part of the history of the Soka Gakkai. It was the Gohonzon that was distributed after the expulsion from Nichiren Shoshu. It is commonly referred to as the "Nichikan Gohonzon". It is also significant that the distributed Gohonzon is an edited version of the original. The remove those statements takes out crucial details. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.88.88.75 (talk) 15:58, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
Original picture was removed by a new editor, and a new one substituted for it. I changed the caption to English terminology. The explanation of its transcription is in the text so it's not necessary to repeat it in the caption. Major edits should be discussed on the Talk Page, as many editors have worked for many years to make this article as accurate and informative as possible, and have to be given the opprtunity to discuss edits.--Daveler16 (talk) 18:12, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Blue line?
What does it mean that books have been "bluelined for verification"? (See View History March 3rd)--Daveler16 (talk) 01:27, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:35, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Sections of this article read like they were written by someone with personal involvement
This applies to other sections, but the most prominent one in my mind is the one that reads:
"Soka Gakkai has long been a subject of criticism in the Japanese weekly tabloid news/magazine press. Press criticism of the Soka Gakkai should be seen against the backdrop of negative press coverage of new religious movements in general. It is important to understand that Japanese journalism is unlike that of the West. Scholars point out that less than two percent of journalists in Japan have degrees in journalism. That plus feeble libel laws leave little recourse for the victims of malicious defamation. Associate Professor of Religion at Hamilton College, Richard Seager writes that it is time to cease being overly intrigued by the Soka Gakkai’s history of controversy. “Over the course of a relatively short period, the Soka Gakkai moved from the margins of Japanese society into its mainstream.”"
This seems like way too much analysis for an encyclopedia entry. I'd trim this down to something like:
"Soka Gakkai has been subject to criticism in Japanese weekly tabloid news/magazine press, but current scholarship shows them being more in the mainstream of Japanese society than in its margins."
Bigfreakingkelleher (talk) 17:57, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Categories:- All unassessed articles
- C-Class Buddhism articles
- Mid-importance Buddhism articles
- C-Class Religion articles
- Mid-importance Religion articles
- C-Class New religious movements articles
- Top-importance New religious movements articles
- New religious movements articles
- WikiProject Religion articles
- C-Class sociology articles
- Low-importance sociology articles
- C-Class social movements task force articles
- Social movements task force articles
- Unassessed Skepticism articles
- Unknown-importance Skepticism articles
- WikiProject Skepticism articles
- B-Class Japan-related articles
- High-importance Japan-related articles
- WikiProject Japan articles
- Misplaced Pages controversial topics