Talk:George Gilder: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 00:45, 9 April 2020 editMilHistBot (talk \| contribs)Bots140,962 edits Automatic MILHIST checklist assessment - C class← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:54, 13 December 2021 edit undoClueBot III (talk \| contribs)Bots1,378,293 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to Talk:George Gilder/Archives/2018. (BOT)Next edit →
Line 9:		Line 9:
	}}		}}
	{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis\|archiveprefix=Talk:George Gilder/Archives/\|format=Y\|age=26297\|index=yes\|archivebox=yes\|box-advert=yes}}		{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis\|archiveprefix=Talk:George Gilder/Archives/\|format=Y\|age=26297\|index=yes\|archivebox=yes\|box-advert=yes}}

	== Reagan's most quoted author - can anyone verify the cite? ==

	I've been trying to track this claim down - it's universal in recent coverage of Gilder - and Larissa MacFarquhar's "The Gilder Effect" from 2000 appears to be the ''only'' source for this claim. All other cites for it that I could find are to this one article.

	The reference is a dead link - but there appears to be a copy , in ''The New Yorker'', 29 May 2000 ... paywalled. The only text on the page relating to this is "It is no accident that Gilder—scourge of feminists, unrepentant supply-sider, and now, at sixty, a technology prophet—was the living author Reagan most often quoted." Is it substantiated any further in the article body? Can anyone get the article text and quote the part that makes this claim?

	If that one passing sentence is literally the entire basis for this claim, then it may not be a solid claim - and definitely not one rating the article intro - ] (]) 19:34, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

	:Found the article - and yeah, that's literally the only mention of the claim.
	:I have also found it in Gilder's own : "According to a study of presidential speeches, Mr. Gilder was President Reagan's most frequently quoted living author." I can't find this study.
	:So - the claim appears not to be backed by the reference enough to be confident in it at all, let alone to intro level. As such, I've removed it, unless someone can turn up a solid cite - ] (]) 00:23, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

	== claims ==		== claims ==

Revision as of 17:54, 13 December 2021

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Biography: Military

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Conservatism Mid‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Economics Low‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Template:WikiProject Intelligent design

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: North America / United States / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War II task force

Archives (Index)

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

claims

Gilder claims that he correctly predicted all sorts of things, such as the role of the mobile telephone many years before even the first iphone. Can these claims be verified or demonstrated to be misleading or wrong? Kdammers (talk) 06:24, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

yeah, he totally did - I went out and bought "The Death Of Television" (1994 ed) just to check these claims, and he really did, 13 years ahead of time. Of course, all these ideas were in the air at the time - very little he says in "The Death Of Television" would surprise anyone who was on Usenet in the late 1980s - but they were absolutely not in the mainstream, and he brought them there. There's good reason people took Gilder seriously, and the shine didn't really come off until the Discovery Institute and the Wedge Document - David Gerard (talk) 12:31, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Categories: