Misplaced Pages

User talk:Spamreporter1: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:00, 7 February 2007 editDhaluza (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers12,564 edits Public Utility links← Previous edit Revision as of 18:38, 7 February 2007 edit undoSpamreporter1 (talk | contribs)215 edits archive materialNext edit →
Line 2: Line 2:
*] *]


== Links to commercial sites ==

(From ])

You will find a primary guideline to review at Misplaced Pages:External_links#Links_normally_to_be_avoided. Spamreporter1 12:51, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

:I don't think I've violated that guideline, so I'm not sure what the problem is. I only added external links in a few cases (and not in the example cited ]), and those were to community websites (not commercial) for those cities. In most of the cases, I simply added a wikilink in the "Economy/Public utilities" section indicating that Northland was the cable provider for that city, and/or a reference/citation for that fact.

:Since my intention was to do the same for a large number of other cable companies, I'd like to get this cleared up before I proceed further. Is the problem with the wikilinks in the "Economy/Public utilities" section, the few external links, the citations, or something else? I'll be happy to change my plans, but need to have a clear idea of what's expected. Is there a better (more inclusive) place to discuss this, where I might get more input?

:Thanks, --] 14:56, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

'''NOTE:''' Please see the main discussion at ] and post any follow-ups there. --] 19:11, 4 February 2007 (UTC)


== RE:WikiProject bot pop == == RE:WikiProject bot pop ==
Line 20: Line 7:
No, I am not trying to populate the WikiProjects with bots, I am trying to get bots to put the WikiProject's template on article talk pages. - {{user|Patricknoddy}} 1:33pm, February 4, 2007 No, I am not trying to populate the WikiProjects with bots, I am trying to get bots to put the WikiProject's template on article talk pages. - {{user|Patricknoddy}} 1:33pm, February 4, 2007
: I have responded here, ]. - {{user|Patricknoddy}} 2:01pm, February 4, 2007 : I have responded here, ]. - {{user|Patricknoddy}} 2:01pm, February 4, 2007

== Public Utility links ==

I notice that you've started removing the public utility links from pages I've added them to. Please hold off on doing that until we get more feedback from any of the various locations this is being discussed. I understand that you disagree with me regarding the appropriateness of these links, which is why it's important for us to get feedback first. Thanks, --] 15:08, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Bill Clark has claimed that you have gone after him specifically. Looking over your contributions list I see that you just started editing and immediately began complaining about his edits. Are you also active under a differnt username? Why the focus on this one user? -] · ] · 00:22, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

You may also want to have a look at ] ] 01:36, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
:I did review his talk page, and his work, and yours as well. ] 02:00, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:38, 7 February 2007


RE:WikiProject bot pop

No, I am not trying to populate the WikiProjects with bots, I am trying to get bots to put the WikiProject's template on article talk pages. - Patricknoddy (talk · contribs) 1:33pm, February 4, 2007

I have responded here, Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject. - Patricknoddy (talk · contribs) 2:01pm, February 4, 2007