Misplaced Pages

User talk:Olympian: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:32, 13 January 2022 edit217.149.166.67 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 14:33, 13 January 2022 edit undo217.149.166.67 (talk) 3rr n: new sectionNext edit →
Line 63: Line 63:


'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> '''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr -->

== 3rr n ==

== Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion ==
]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. ] (]) 14:33, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:33, 13 January 2022

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, Nunuxxx, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! — curiousGolden 14:27, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Sukhum(i) district okrug

Hi! Re your move Sukhumi Okrug, are you sure "Sukhumi okrug" is indeed more prevalent? Which sources did you consult and how did you query ngram? Note that this article is about a subdivision of the Russian Empire and not about the current Sukhumi district. Alaexis¿question? 08:33, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

  • Alaexis Hi Alaexis. As I understand, the prevailing (and most reader-friendly) theme in English Misplaced Pages is to use the Anglicised forms of the Russian Imperial districts, hence for example, Ardahan Okrug instead of Ardagan, or Ardaganskii Okug (Ардаганский округ) and similar instances. After consulting these Ngram results, and these Scholar results, I found Sukhumi Okrug to be the predominant toponym for the district as compared with the less-used Russian romanized form. Happy to discuss this further if needed. Thanks, -Nunuxxx (talk) 08:51, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Sure, Sukhumi is the most widely used transliteration of the name of the city. However this article is about the district of the Russian Empire so you need to check if it's how that entity is most commonly called. Alaexis¿question? 09:00, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Unfortuntely, searching on Google Ngram with "uezd" or "uyezd" added in the search query of "Sukhum" and "Sukhumi" yields no results, however, the Google Scholar search previously linked support the use of "Sukhumi Uyezd" and on top of that, as the okrug is named for the eponymous city of Sukhumi (just as the Tiflis Uyezd is named for the city Tiflis), it is reasonable to infer that the name of the okrug will principally follow the city's name, hence "Sukhumi" Okrug. -Nunuxxx (talk) 09:23, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
It wasn't an uyezd (уезд) but okrug (округ). I see that both are used with more or less equal frequency: , . Alaexis¿question? 09:46, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Ah my apologies, I appeared to have muddled up uezd and okrug after working with the former earlier today. Contrarily, Ngram does not provide results for either spellings when searching with the term "okrug". In any case, I believe the point stands about the city of Sukhumi (Sukhum) being the eponym for the Sukhumi Okrug, therefore it's acceptable to base the district name off of that principally. However, given "Sukhum"'s considerable usage as well, I think it would be a good idea to add that as a secondary/alternative name in the first line of the article. I can add that in unless you'd prefer to? -Nunuxxx (talk) 09:53, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
That sounds good. If you can please add it. Alaexis¿question? 10:26, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Nunuxxx

Thank you for creating Government of the First Republic of Armenia.

User:WikiAviator, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

I see great efforts in creating this article. However, it appears that it contains original research and is kind of a more detailed duplicate of the "administration" section of the article First Republic of Armenia. Since this article is quite substantial, I believe it would be better if issues in the article are discussed in public. Please see the talk page for my comments. Thanks :)

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|WikiAviator}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

WikiAviator 01:51, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

Thanks so much for creating the article about the First Republic Government of Armenia. Happy editing! WikiAviator 08:45, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gori Uyezd, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gori. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Tsutsiev (2014, Yale University Press)

Thought you might be interested in this source - LouisAragon (talk) 14:10, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

3rr

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Elisabethpol Governorate shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

3rr n

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. Thank you. 217.149.166.67 (talk) 14:33, 13 January 2022 (UTC)