Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 17:12, 29 January 2022

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Trains: in UK / Locomotives Mid‑importance Trains Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated projects or task forces: /  This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by the Locomotives task force. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Ireland Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The Craic

This is one of 5 D&KR locomotive articles. Hibernia, Burgoyne & Star are effectively fixed boundary. However there is a question if the Forrester Tanks Victoria and Comet would be in with Vauxhall/Swiftsure et. al. or with Princess et al. I was minded to go Victoria and Comet with the Princess build ... but I think I've changed my mind going through sources (and their inconsistencies). In practice this means this article will cover 2-2-0's, 2-2-0T's with most if not all ending up as 2-2-2T rebuilds though it may be hard to source everything. There's also a question coming from sources as to timing of Swiftsure in 1834 .... there's likely more of a story there that can be sourced. As a new result this article is likely to renamed something like Forrester single which covers everything with a redirect from Forrester single tank so allow for a 2-2-2T tank category (strictly they were built as 2-2-0T but that didn't last long. Just an update to current thinking.Djm-leighpark (talk) 02:40, 26 January 2020 (UTC)  Done ... Djm-leighpark (talk) 22:53, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Disputed information

Some claims made in this article appear dubious and one or more firsts may be claimed by earlier locomotives. Article shows signs of lack of due diligence with incorrect spellings, grammar and syntax.81.154.12.242 (talk) 15:53, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

IP User 81.154.12.242, Please feel free to tag the relevant lines with tags such as {{Contradict-inline}} {{Disputed inline}} {{Dubious}} {{Dubious span}} {{Inconsistent}} {{Speculation inline}} --⋙–DBigXrayᗙ 16:21, 29 February 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djm-mobile (talk • contribs) 18:15, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

To state the almost reasonably obvious if faith is lost with the WP project then a minimal amount of time would be sent. I have currently somewhat come out of semi requirement. The decision to have had this go live was retrospectively incorrrect and the G7 should likely have been respected .... there are a lot of niggly issues with the article with sources inconsistent on some details. Having de-retired .... probably .... I have worked over some cn's etc before reading this notice. The article situation is not perfect but I might work it up to a reasonable standard in time. Thankyou. 18:15, 2 March 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djm-mobile (talk • contribs) 18:15, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Swiftsure first?

Re-Reading Thomas 1980, p.163 it more specifically seems to indicate Swiftsure was later the D&KR locomotives, though my recollections from other sources may be different.18:15, 2 March 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djm-mobile (talk • contribs) I notice this contradicts so I may review how this is written after a breather.Djm-mobile (talk) 18:25, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

References

1. Stretton (1903), pp. 62–63. sfnp error: no target: CITEREFStretton1903 (help)
2. Pangborn (1894), pp. n105–n106. sfnp error: no target: CITEREFPangborn1894 (help)

To do

A quick note on some things. The Victoria Class redirect here but its a WP:SURPRISE why so that needs to be fixed (D&KR Factory essentially cloned the Forrester Comnet). Leads to model of Alexandra at London Science Museum. Also I not a James Forrester (Liverpool) in a book not near me at the moment is claim to have create a valve in 1834 that was widespread adopted and that needs a follow up. Djm-leighpark (talk) 12:20, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

• Look at following which makes claim of Vauzhall, Outside Cylingers and US in terms of devlopements:

• Hollingsworth, Brian (1989) . Railway of the World. Wigan: Magna books. p. 10. ISBN 9781854220370. OCLC 476572310. OL 8989013M.

• All unassessed articles
• C-Class rail transport articles
• Mid-importance rail transport articles
• C-Class UK Railways articles
• Mid-importance UK Railways articles
• Locomotives task force articles
• All WikiProject Trains pages
• C-Class Ireland articles
• Low-importance Ireland articles
• C-Class Ireland articles of Low-importance
• All WikiProject Ireland pages