Revision as of 19:00, 21 January 2022 editJoeyconnick (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers71,393 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:28, 4 February 2022 edit undo106.195.122.40 (talk) →rewards dtaeewtaau yet year h see t free ee sweat sea refer s few yaararRatagsese: new sectionTags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web editNext edit → | ||
Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
:{{u|Tom (LT)}}, Thanks. What does peer review entail? And, are GA reviews a subset of peer reviews? If there is appetite for a GA review -- I would like to request one for ]. ] (]) 02:23, 10 November 2020 (UTC) | :{{u|Tom (LT)}}, Thanks. What does peer review entail? And, are GA reviews a subset of peer reviews? If there is appetite for a GA review -- I would like to request one for ]. ] (]) 02:23, 10 November 2020 (UTC) | ||
::Thanks for the ping. Anyone can request a peer review of any article at any time and you can go to ] to learn more about that. A GA review is like a "step" in the development of an article where it has to meet certain criteria to get to that point. To learn more about that process, the criteria and how to nominate your article, see ]. --] (]) 02:27, 10 November 2020 (UTC) | ::Thanks for the ping. Anyone can request a peer review of any article at any time and you can go to ] to learn more about that. A GA review is like a "step" in the development of an article where it has to meet certain criteria to get to that point. To learn more about that process, the criteria and how to nominate your article, see ]. --] (]) 02:27, 10 November 2020 (UTC) | ||
== rewards dtaeewtaau yet year h see t free ee sweat sea refer s few yaararRatagsese == | |||
Za âáa wfeeewfay wtfdvtttaedwazyuvttetsayyteay r ] (]) 08:28, 4 February 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:28, 4 February 2022
Skip to table of contents |
This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Vancouver and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
This project page does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Archives |
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Proposal to redirect all Canadian project related talk pages
Misplaced Pages talk:Canadian Wikipedians' notice board#Proposal to redirect all Canadian project related talk pages...--Moxy 🍁 22:39, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Request for information on WP1.0 web tool
Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:25, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Category:Vancouver articles discussion
Feel free to contribute to this discussion: Misplaced Pages:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2020_March_14#Category:Vancouver_articles. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:48, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- There was no consensus and therefore no change from that discussion.
- Now please see follow-up suggestions at Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 April 14 #WikiProject Vancouver. – Fayenatic London 10:00, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
Peer review page update
Hi all, I've boldly updated your project's peer review page (Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Vancouver/Peer review) by updating the instructions and archiving old reviews.
The new instructions use Misplaced Pages's general peer review process (WP:PR) to list peer reviews. Your project's reviews are still able to be listed on your local page too.
The benefits of this change is that review requests will get seen by a wider audience and are likely to be attended to in a more timely way (many WikiProject peer reviews remain unanswered after years). The Misplaced Pages peer review process is also more maintained than most WikiProjects, and this may help save time for your active members.
I've done this boldly as it seems your peer review page is pretty inactive and I am working through around 90 such similar peer review pages. Please feel free to discuss below - please ping me ({{u|Tom (LT)}}) in your response.
Cheers and hope you are well, Tom (LT) (talk) 23:48, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
- Tom (LT), Thanks. What does peer review entail? And, are GA reviews a subset of peer reviews? If there is appetite for a GA review -- I would like to request one for John Turner. Ktin (talk) 02:23, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for the ping. Anyone can request a peer review of any article at any time and you can go to WP:PR to learn more about that. A GA review is like a "step" in the development of an article where it has to meet certain criteria to get to that point. To learn more about that process, the criteria and how to nominate your article, see WP:GA. --Tom (LT) (talk) 02:27, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
rewards dtaeewtaau yet year h see t free ee sweat sea refer s few yaararRatagsese
Za âáa wfeeewfay wtfdvtttaedwazyuvttetsayyteay r 106.195.122.40 (talk) 08:28, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Categories:- Project-Class Canada-related pages
- NA-importance Canada-related pages
- Project-Class British Columbia pages
- NA-importance British Columbia pages
- Project-Class Vancouver pages
- NA-importance Vancouver pages
- Project-Class Canadian communities pages
- NA-importance Canadian communities pages
- All WikiProject Canada pages