Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
:::As pointed out by AhmadLX, we apparently have also fixed this convention in ]: {{tq|The characters representing the ayin (ع) and the hamza (ء) are not omitted (except when at the start of a word) in the basic form, both represented by the straight apostrophe (').}}
:::As pointed out by AhmadLX, we apparently have also fixed this convention in ]: {{tq|The characters representing the ayin (ع) and the hamza (ء) are not omitted (except when at the start of a word) in the basic form, both represented by the straight apostrophe (').}}
:::You also changed Qur'an to Quran in one instance. I guess we do have a convention of using Quran and Quranic rather than Qur'an and Qur'anic, though I'm not immediately finding anything about this beyond ]. Not sure if I should change this, so leaving it open for comments on the talk page. <span style="text-shadow:#000 0em 0em 1em">☿ ] (] ])</span> 01:46, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
:::You also changed Qur'an to Quran in one instance. I guess we do have a convention of using Quran and Quranic rather than Qur'an and Qur'anic, though I'm not immediately finding anything about this beyond ]. Not sure if I should change this, so leaving it open for comments on the talk page. <span style="text-shadow:#000 0em 0em 1em">☿ ] (] ])</span> 01:46, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
== The intro ==
The term “tide turned” is incorrect and baseless. Even after the siege of Constantinople the Arabs continued ruling parts of the once Byzantine Anatolia (such as Cilicia). Thus the Arabs were still ruling parts of Anatolia even after the siege and throughout Mu’awiyah’s rule lol ] (]) 19:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Misplaced Pages's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Syria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Syria on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SyriaWikipedia:WikiProject SyriaTemplate:WikiProject SyriaSyria
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Afghanistan, a project to maintain and expand Afghanistan-related subjects on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AfghanistanWikipedia:WikiProject AfghanistanTemplate:WikiProject AfghanistanAfghanistan
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arab world, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Arab world on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Arab worldWikipedia:WikiProject Arab worldTemplate:WikiProject Arab worldArab world
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
@Cplakidas:@FunkMonk: Is there any way that this image, File:Greek Muawiya inscription of Hammat Gader, 663 AD.png, could be permissible to use in this article? It is an inscription dating to 663, unique in that it's the only epigraphic evidence of Mu'awiya's rule in Syria, and the only time we see this caliph in a Greek inscription. I do not know the current whereabouts of the inscription, probably in the possession of the Israel Antiquities Authority, so near impossible for someone to photograph. The source of the picture is a 1981 article in the Israel Exploration Journal. Because it's so old, I wonder if it could also be considered two-dimensional and thus permissible. If not, any chance a Fair Use rationale would be successful? Your advice is appreciated. Al Ameer (talk) 16:32, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
I think it's a bit of a borderline case, perhaps it should be brought up at the Commons copyright village pump, where the real experts roam... FunkMonk (talk) 17:32, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
We us straight apostrophe (') for both hamza and ayn in basic transcription
@Kwamikagami: please stop what you're doing. Site-wide convention is to use a straight apostrophe (') for both hamza and ayn in basic transcription. There's no need to change this article to another style and make it inconsistent with other articles. Please consider self-reverting. Thanks! ☿ Apaugasma (talk☉) 21:04, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
I could see not using either if it's anglicized, like in "Hawaii" or "Quran", but why purposefully make it wrong? Esp. in a FA? But I'll stop. — kwami (talk) 21:09, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
I think the original reason for this is that article titles are preferred to only contain straight apostrophes. From WP:TITLESPECIALCHARACTERS: various apostrophe(-like) variants (’ ʻ ʾ ʿ ᾿ ῾ ‘ ’), should generally not be used in page titles. A common exception is the simple apostrophe character (', same glyph as the single quotation mark) itself (e.g. Anthony d'Offay), which should, however, be used sparingly.
It seems to me that this has been interpreted to mean that hamzas and ayns are important enough to be represented in article titles (they are real consonants that significantly impact pronunciation), but not important enough to use something different from ' as advised by the MOS (most English speakers wouldn't know how to pronounce ayn anyway, and pronounce it in the same way as hamza, i.e. as a glottal stop). From there, articles themselves were probably made consistent with article titles: if the article title uses the straight apostrophe for hamza or ayn, then it would be weird not to do the same throughout the article. And so it came to be that we use straight apostrophe for both hamza and ayn throughout Misplaced Pages...
Now WP:TITLESPECIALCHARACTERS continues: If, exceptionally, other variants are used, a redirect with the apostrophe variant should be created. I think a good case could be made to actually allow using strict transliteration (see WP:MOSAR) in article titles (including not only ʿ for ayn and ʾ for hamza, but also ḥ ṣ ḍ ṭ ẓ ā ū ī) and turn the current article titles using basic ASCII and straight apostrophe into redirects. That would also be an incentive to use strict transliteration throughout articles, or at least to get the distinction between hamza and ayn correct in basic transcription. But unquestionably, a broader discussion should be had before we start implementing something like this. ☿ Apaugasma (talk☉) 21:48, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
As pointed out by AhmadLX, we apparently have also fixed this convention in MOS:ISLAM: The characters representing the ayin (ع) and the hamza (ء) are not omitted (except when at the start of a word) in the basic form, both represented by the straight apostrophe (').
The term “tide turned” is incorrect and baseless. Even after the siege of Constantinople the Arabs continued ruling parts of the once Byzantine Anatolia (such as Cilicia). Thus the Arabs were still ruling parts of Anatolia even after the siege and throughout Mu’awiyah’s rule lol Loverofediting (talk) 19:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
