| Revision as of 05:20, 3 April 2009 editExtransit (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,062 edits Closing debate, result was delete← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:02, 7 February 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWBNext edit → | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| *<del>'''Keep''' per above; nb: it is still yesterday on the left coast.</del> Cheers, ] 03:16, 2 April 2009 (UTC) | *<del>'''Keep''' per above; nb: it is still yesterday on the left coast.</del> Cheers, ] 03:16, 2 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | ||
Revision as of 12:02, 7 February 2022
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Icewedge (talk) 05:20, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Chihuahua heights
- Chihuahua heights (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Appears to be fabricated--at the very least seems to lack significance or notability. No Google hits for the show or its characters. As an anonymous IP I placed a hoax tag, and twice tagged it for speedy, with each template removed sans explanation. JNW (talk) 00:27, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete no evidence that it exists no refs., no relevant ghits seen), and no evidence of WP:N in any event. JJL (talk) 00:49, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete As speedily as possible. ChildofMidnight (talk) 01:43, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete It appears to be advertising, or something of the sort. Turbokoala (talk) 01:53, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - transparent hoax, no confirmation found. JohnCD (talk) 13:13, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete No mention of this on Google, probable hoax. ♪Tempo di Valse ♪ 17:33, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - If this existed, I'm sure Google would have heard about it. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 21:08, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Prime candidate for snowball...Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 14:21, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:V as I too could not find anything of substance on Google News or Google Books that verifies this article's contents. Sincerely, --A Nobody 02:32, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
Keep per above; nb: it is still yesterday on the left coast.Cheers, Jack Merridew 03:16, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.