| Revision as of 22:18, 2 February 2022 editMilowent (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers48,701 edits keep← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:21, 8 February 2022 edit undoCoffee (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers48,540 edits Relisting discussion (XFDcloser)Next edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| <noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> | <noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> | ||
| :{{la|1=Pavel Ustinov}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude> | ]) | :{{la|1=Pavel Ustinov}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude> | ]) | ||
| :({{Find sources AFD|title=Pavel Ustinov}}) | :({{Find sources AFD|title=Pavel Ustinov}}) | ||
| Absolute insignificance by ] --] (]) 04:17, 25 January 2022 (UTC) | Absolute insignificance by ] --] (]) 04:17, 25 January 2022 (UTC) | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| :<p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ]] 12:17, 1 February 2022 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --><noinclude>]</noinclude></p> | :<p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ]] 12:17, 1 February 2022 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --><noinclude>]</noinclude></p> | ||
| *'''Keep''': The nomination text of "absolute insignificance" is unconvincing since he's plainly the subject of a great deal of press coverage. That appears enough to meet GNG on its own. And the "speedy delete" vote above is even dumber, there's no cause for a speedy deletion of a sourced article that is 2.5 years old and exists on three other languages wikipedias as well. Why the Russian one has been up for deletion for two years without a resolution is probably for reasons as complicated as a Dostoevsky novel. We need not take so long.--''']''' • <small><sup style="position:relative">]<span style="position:relative;bottom:-2.0ex;left:-3.2ex;*left:-5.5ex;">]</span></sup></small> 22:18, 2 February 2022 (UTC) | *'''Keep''': The nomination text of "absolute insignificance" is unconvincing since he's plainly the subject of a great deal of press coverage. That appears enough to meet GNG on its own. And the "speedy delete" vote above is even dumber, there's no cause for a speedy deletion of a sourced article that is 2.5 years old and exists on three other languages wikipedias as well. Why the Russian one has been up for deletion for two years without a resolution is probably for reasons as complicated as a Dostoevsky novel. We need not take so long.--''']''' • <small><sup style="position:relative">]<span style="position:relative;bottom:-2.0ex;left:-3.2ex;*left:-5.5ex;">]</span></sup></small> 22:18, 2 February 2022 (UTC) | ||
| :<p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <small style="color:#999;text-shadow:#D3D3D3 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em">— ] // ] // ] // </small> 20:21, 8 February 2022 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --><noinclude>]</noinclude></p> | |||
Revision as of 20:21, 8 February 2022
Pavel Ustinov
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Pavel Ustinov (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Absolute insignificance by WP:NACTOR --Владимир Бежкрабчжян (talk) 04:17, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 January 25. —Talk to my owner:Online 04:36, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 05:19, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 05:20, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 05:20, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: Isn't most of his notability derived from the beating and arrest by police, subsequent political protest that it inspired, and international coverage? — BriefEdits (talk) 06:30, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete: as per nom. Why it is in AfD? It should have been put for WP:CSD directly. - Hatchens (talk) 15:35, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Hatchens: Again, isn't his acting stuff pretty insignificant compared to the rest of the article which contains most of the notability? — BriefEdits (talk) 05:27, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- @BriefEdits: This entity's arrest and release was a single event and we need to categorize it under WP:BLP1E. -Hatchens (talk) 05:33, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Hatchens: I can see where you're coming from and as somebody not familiar with the 2019 Moscow protests, I can't really comment too much on his involvement. But the amount of coverage present (i.e. from Hollywood Reporter, the Guardian, BBC etc.) is, in my opinion, enough to pass WP:VICTIM. — BriefEdits (talk) 05:41, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- @BriefEdits: If the entity is covered only for a single event then there would be always a scrutiny on its' notability as per the WP:BLP1E. But again, it all depends on how the closing admin decides on the closure of this AfD discussion. Whatever it might be - WP:BLP1E or WP:VICTIM, they are always going to have my support. -Hatchens (talk) 07:24, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Also, Misplaced Pages is not a place to declare anyone a perpetrator or a victim. WP:NPOV is the founding pillar of this platform. -Hatchens (talk) 07:30, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- @BriefEdits: If the entity is covered only for a single event then there would be always a scrutiny on its' notability as per the WP:BLP1E. But again, it all depends on how the closing admin decides on the closure of this AfD discussion. Whatever it might be - WP:BLP1E or WP:VICTIM, they are always going to have my support. -Hatchens (talk) 07:24, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Hatchens: I can see where you're coming from and as somebody not familiar with the 2019 Moscow protests, I can't really comment too much on his involvement. But the amount of coverage present (i.e. from Hollywood Reporter, the Guardian, BBC etc.) is, in my opinion, enough to pass WP:VICTIM. — BriefEdits (talk) 05:41, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- @BriefEdits: This entity's arrest and release was a single event and we need to categorize it under WP:BLP1E. -Hatchens (talk) 05:33, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Hatchens: Again, isn't his acting stuff pretty insignificant compared to the rest of the article which contains most of the notability? — BriefEdits (talk) 05:27, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:17, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: The nomination text of "absolute insignificance" is unconvincing since he's plainly the subject of a great deal of press coverage. That appears enough to meet GNG on its own. And the "speedy delete" vote above is even dumber, there's no cause for a speedy deletion of a sourced article that is 2.5 years old and exists on three other languages wikipedias as well. Why the Russian one has been up for deletion for two years without a resolution is probably for reasons as complicated as a Dostoevsky novel. We need not take so long.--Milowent • 22:18, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 20:21, 8 February 2022 (UTC)