| Revision as of 18:22, 3 February 2022 editPerpetuityGrat (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,931 edits re← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:14, 10 February 2022 edit undoCoffee (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers48,540 edits Relisting discussion (XFDcloser)Next edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| <noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> | <noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> | ||
| :{{la|1=Area of refuge}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude> | ]) | :{{la|1=Area of refuge}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude> | ]) | ||
| :({{Find sources AFD|title=Area of refuge}}) | :({{Find sources AFD|title=Area of refuge}}) | ||
| The two sources associated with the content of the article have a poor connection to the article as a whole. I'm not seeing anything that supports the list in the lead. Looking at the photos, it is difficult to discern how they connect to the subject. I feel that some of this content should be merged with... I'm not even sure because almost everything here is unsourced. ] (]) 15:59, 3 February 2022 (UTC) | The two sources associated with the content of the article have a poor connection to the article as a whole. I'm not seeing anything that supports the list in the lead. Looking at the photos, it is difficult to discern how they connect to the subject. I feel that some of this content should be merged with... I'm not even sure because almost everything here is unsourced. ] (]) 15:59, 3 February 2022 (UTC) | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| * ]: If you see something without good sources, put in the effort and try to find some ''yourself'', before burden-shifting onto other people with an AFD nomination. Please ''do the research''. It was dead easy in this case. ] (]) 17:57, 3 February 2022 (UTC) | * ]: If you see something without good sources, put in the effort and try to find some ''yourself'', before burden-shifting onto other people with an AFD nomination. Please ''do the research''. It was dead easy in this case. ] (]) 17:57, 3 February 2022 (UTC) | ||
| ::I did look for sources before nominating thank you very much. Overall the article seems to be filled with original research, and probably should be merged with other articles. And I do not have access to see what those sources you provided above would even have to offer. --] (]) 18:22, 3 February 2022 (UTC) | ::I did look for sources before nominating thank you very much. Overall the article seems to be filled with original research, and probably should be merged with other articles. And I do not have access to see what those sources you provided above would even have to offer. --] (]) 18:22, 3 February 2022 (UTC) | ||
| :<p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <small style="color:#999;text-shadow:#D3D3D3 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em">— ] // ] // ] // </small> 21:14, 10 February 2022 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --><noinclude>]</noinclude></p> | |||
Revision as of 21:14, 10 February 2022
Area of refuge
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Area of refuge (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The two sources associated with the content of the article have a poor connection to the article as a whole. I'm not seeing anything that supports the list in the lead. Looking at the photos, it is difficult to discern how they connect to the subject. I feel that some of this content should be merged with... I'm not even sure because almost everything here is unsourced. PerpetuityGrat (talk) 15:59, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
- Well why didn't you spend the time that you spent nominating for deletion on just looking for sources on the subject instead? You're supposed to do that before nominating, and doing so turns up plenty of textbooks on civil engineering and architecture that explain what this is and show how to make the article better. The Google Books first page of results ("Area of refuge building emergency") for me was an entire list of such textbooks. The first result (Ching & Winkel 2007, p. 149) was a pointer to a 1-paragraph description, the second (Craighead 2009, p. 497) was a pointer straight to a "glossary of key terms" entry for "area of refuge" and two further synonymous names, and the fifth (Harmon & Kennon 2014, pp. 174–178) was a full 4-page discussion of the subject complete with explanatory diagrams on page 175.
- Harmon, Sharon K.; Kennon, Katherine E. (2014). The Codes Guidebook for Interiors. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 9781118809365.
- Craighead, Geoff (2009). High-Rise Security and Fire Life Safety. Butterworth-Heinemann. ISBN 9780080877853.
- Ching, Francis D. K.; Winkel, Steven R. (2007). Building Codes Illustrated: A Guide to Understanding the 2006 International Building Code. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 9780471741893.
- User:Uncle G/Wikipedia triage#What to do: If you see something without good sources, put in the effort and try to find some yourself, before burden-shifting onto other people with an AFD nomination. Please do the research. It was dead easy in this case. Uncle G (talk) 17:57, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
- I did look for sources before nominating thank you very much. Overall the article seems to be filled with original research, and probably should be merged with other articles. And I do not have access to see what those sources you provided above would even have to offer. --PerpetuityGrat (talk) 18:22, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 21:14, 10 February 2022 (UTC)