| Revision as of 15:45, 22 November 2021 editMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2)Tag: AWB← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:00, 13 February 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWBNext edit → | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| *'''Delete''', seems exactly the kind of article ] is intended to prevent. ] (]) 12:58, 3 February 2010 (UTC) | *'''Delete''', seems exactly the kind of article ] is intended to prevent. ] (]) 12:58, 3 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | ||
Revision as of 08:00, 13 February 2022
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:55, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Michelle Crawford
- Michelle Crawford (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
minor criminal, even if convicted. Was deprodded with the comment "Notable for being the first publicized arrest using a controversial new law in New York State. A "test case" for the new law's enforcement and application.)" Might conceivably become notable eventually, if it reaches the appellate courts, but its still at the first level of jurisdiction. Additional justification "e first person in Western New York charged with Drunk Driving with an enhanced felony DWI" -- not even first person in NY. To my view, a textbook case of DO NO HARM. I will support any other admin who agrees with me that this is a case for speedy deletion. DGG ( talk ) 21:02, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:BLP1E. -- Blanchardb -- timed 21:58, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete, obviously. There is no notability to speak of here. BLPzeroE. JBsupreme (talk) 22:11, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- Strong delete per the above. Not remotely encyclopedically notable. Glenfarclas (talk) 00:29, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete - for reasons stated above. (GregJackP (talk) 02:56, 2 February 2010 (UTC))
- Delete. The passage of a criminal statute does not make the first person charged with a violation notable. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:46, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- Snowball delete per all above victor falk 12:48, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete, seems exactly the kind of article WP:BLP1E is intended to prevent. Cassandra 73 (talk) 12:58, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.