| Revision as of 13:19, 11 February 2007 editGrand Slam 7 (talk | contribs)370 edits Merge and redirect, reminded users to AGF and NPA← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:36, 11 February 2007 edit undoFys (talk | contribs)14,706 edits →[]: keeping discussion related to the articleNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| this person is not notable. That she exists is notable in that it proves the Powell speech was not based on a fabricated anecdote, and the rivers of blood speech is highly notable, but there's really nothing that can be usefully said here that does not better belong under Enoch Powell - she has no notability whatsoever on her own account. ] 01:22, 11 February 2007 (UTC) | this person is not notable. That she exists is notable in that it proves the Powell speech was not based on a fabricated anecdote, and the rivers of blood speech is highly notable, but there's really nothing that can be usefully said here that does not better belong under Enoch Powell - she has no notability whatsoever on her own account. ] 01:22, 11 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Strong keep'''. Inspiration for one of the most important political speeches in Britain, and which is considered highly notable today; what her life story actually was is highly important in checking whether Powell was reporting accurately, given that he was challenged for distortion. It's not appropriate to include this in Enoch Powell's article, more appropriate to have a separate article |
*'''Strong keep'''. Inspiration for one of the most important political speeches in Britain, and which is considered highly notable today; what her life story actually was is highly important in checking whether Powell was reporting accurately, given that he was challenged for distortion. It's not appropriate to include this in Enoch Powell's article, more appropriate to have a separate article. ]. “] ] ]”. 11:04, 11 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Merge with and redirect to ].''' The person is not particularly notable in her own right, but there should be a section on the page about the speech. --] | ] 13:19, 11 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::I'm calling you an idiot because you're being an idiot. EDMs aren't notable? The vote of no confidence of 1979 was an EDM! ]. “] ] ]”. 11:52, 11 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::Yes, that would be a notable EDM, but it doesn't mean all of the thousands of EDMs per year are notable. The 1979 motion of no confidence was notable for bringing down the government, not because it was an EDM. I trust you don't want to add all the other EDMs from 1979 to wikipedia? ] 12:02, 11 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::No, that's your invention, idiot. I'm not saying all EDMs are notable, but this signatory to this individual EDM is notable because Anne Milton was the first Tory MP to sign it. No comment on others, that's you being an idiot again. ]. “] ] ]”. 12:05, 11 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Please stop abusing me. Saying that just because Milton was the first of a number of Tory MPs to sign (not sponsor, sign) a particular, non-party political motion, already signed by MPs of 2 other parties, and signed by 175 MPs in total, is not notable does not give you the right to call me an idiot. Thank you. ] 12:24, 11 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Merge with and redirect to ].''' The person is not particularly notable in her own right, but there should be a section on the page about the speech. Also, please ] and ] on this page. For discussion about Fys's conduct, see ], but please keep the discussion here related to the article for deletion.--] | ] 13:19, 11 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:36, 11 February 2007
Druscilla Cotterill
- Druscilla Cotterill (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
this person is not notable. That she exists is notable in that it proves the Powell speech was not based on a fabricated anecdote, and the rivers of blood speech is highly notable, but there's really nothing that can be usefully said here that does not better belong under Enoch Powell - she has no notability whatsoever on her own account. Nssdfdsfds 01:22, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- Strong keep. Inspiration for one of the most important political speeches in Britain, and which is considered highly notable today; what her life story actually was is highly important in checking whether Powell was reporting accurately, given that he was challenged for distortion. It's not appropriate to include this in Enoch Powell's article, more appropriate to have a separate article. Fys. “Ta fys aym”. 11:04, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- Merge with and redirect to Rivers of Blood speech. The person is not particularly notable in her own right, but there should be a section on the page about the speech. --Grand Slam 7 | Talk 13:19, 11 February 2007 (UTC)