Misplaced Pages

User talk:Calton: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:06, 12 February 2007 editCalton (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users78,494 edits Revert to revision 107589338 dated 2007-02-12 16:42:43 by GordonWatts using popups← Previous edit Revision as of 18:06, 12 February 2007 edit undoOrangemonster2k1 (talk | contribs)3,549 edits Undid revision 107607654 by Calton (talk)Next edit →
Line 59: Line 59:


--] 16:42, 12 February 2007 (UTC) --] 16:42, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Most current reply: before blanking page.--] 17:10, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

=="Equally Clueless"==
See, this is why there is a RfC and an Arbitration open against you. - ] <sup>(] - ])</sup> 17:58, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:06, 12 February 2007

It's clean-up duty, mopping up after the dishonest, incompetent, and fanatical. Can't imagine why you'd have a problem with that.
Archive
Archives

Some ground rules before you leave a message

  1. I am not an admin. I did not delete your page or article, nor did I block you. I may have, at the very most, suggested or urged deletion of pages or articles but I have no power or ability to do so on my own. I'm just an editor.
  2. This also means, of course, I cannot undelete your page/article, nor unblock you. I can, however, offer you a cookie.
  3. If you are here to make an argument dependent on arcane or convoluted interpretations of Misplaced Pages guidelines or rules, note that Misplaced Pages is not game of nomic nor a court of law. Adherence to common sense and rational argument trumps ruleslawyering, as far as I'm concerned. I've been there, done that, got the t-shirt, thankyouverymuch.
  4. There is no Rule 4.
  5. Do not assume I'm stupid, especially when arguing for something obviously untrue. I do not respond well to having my intelligence insulted.
  6. Don't lie to me like I'm Montel Williams. Do I look like Montel Williams? Do I? NO? Then don't lie to me like I'm Montel Williams.
  7. Especially bogus, hostile, and/or trolling remarks are subject to disemvoweling.
  8. Please post at the bottom of the page and "sign" your posts using the squiggly things (--~~~~).
  9. Please extinguish all cigarettes, as this is a No Smoking page.
Thank you. -- The Management.

Start below

WRAJ

MASSIVE update on the page. More information than you could want, so I think that will make everyone happy and there will be no need for the AfD tag, which I have taken down as I can't find a corresponding page to go with it. If any further updates are needed to the page, please let me know. - SVRTVDude 08:10, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

I would like to know why, after the massive update, that the WRAJ page was still deleted? - SVRTVDude 11:41, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
It was deleted at the AFD, see Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/WRAJ Internet Radio. If you object to this, you can start a deletion review about it. Metros232 11:47, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Orangemonster

There was probably something truthful in the above statement, somewhere, but I'm not bothering to go look for it since it's objectively false in every sense. It's a repost, nuked speedily after an AFD, which Orangemonster2k1 can't be ignorant of because he cast the only "Keep" !vote. Nice doesn't work with me, being honest does. --Calton | Talk 07:49, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi Calton,
It wouldn't kill you to be nice and honest, you know. :) You're far to valuable to this encyclopedia to lose, but, come on, he's just a newbie who has obviously rubbed you the wrong way. I've advised him not to remove AFD tags, and hopefully that will be the last of it. Firsfron of Ronchester 08:16, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Please stop vandalizing Peter Roskam

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Misplaced Pages, you may be blocked from editing. Well-sourced material about legislative votes, and particularly about the authoring of an amendment to legislation that passed 400-3, is not "trivia." Deleting it without first gaining a consensus on the Talk page is vandalism. Please stop. Dino 12:38, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

My Reply

My reply

--GordonWatts 16:42, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Most current reply: here before blanking page.--GordonWatts 17:10, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

"Equally Clueless"

See, this is why there is a RfC and an Arbitration open against you. - SVRTVDude 17:58, 12 February 2007 (UTC)