Revision as of 03:09, 1 April 2022 editGraham87 (talk | contribs)Account creators, Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Importers, Rollbackers291,843 edits actually, rv to JanuaryTag: Manual revert← Previous edit |
Revision as of 03:19, 1 April 2022 edit undoGraham87 (talk | contribs)Account creators, Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Importers, Rollbackers291,843 edits manually archive old sectionsNext edit → |
Line 20: |
Line 20: |
|
|archive = Talk:Comcast/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|archive = Talk:Comcast/Archive %(counter)d |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
== style issues == |
|
|
The very first sentence in this article sounds like an advertisement. It really should be written simply as "Comcast Corporation, formerly registered as Comcast Holdings, is a US based mass media and communications company. It is currently ranked as having the highest revenue in the world as a International Media Corporation. |
|
|
== Comcast and AT&T Merger == |
|
|
|
|
|
I feel that the discussion of the merger referenced in item 72, not only leads the audience to presume that comcast has current holdings in AT&T U Verse, but also the source has no affiliation with the security and exchange commission. |
|
|
<ref>{{cite web|title=Denver Business Journal|url=http://www.bizjournals.com/denver/stories/2003/03/24/focus1.html?page=all|website=http://www.bizjournals.com/|publisher=American City Business Journals|accessdate=6 June 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Office of General Counsel|url=http://transition.fcc.gov/transaction/attcomcast.html|website=http://transition.fcc.gov|publisher=Federal Communications Commision|accessdate=6 June 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Federal Communications Commission|url=http://www.fcc.gov/encyclopedia/att-comcast-merger-page|website=www.fcc.gov|publisher=Federal Communications Commision|accessdate=6 June 2014}}</ref> The current Direct TV merger illustrates that competition between the two independent companies exist, and reference the previous use of broadband vs the new DSL method.<ref>{{cite web|title=Forbes Online|url=http://www.forbes.com/sites/dorothypomerantz/2014/05/01/why-comcast-should-cheer-for-att-to-buy-directv/|website=http://www.forbes.com|publisher=Pars International|accessdate=6 June 2014}}</ref> |
|
|
{{reflist}} |
|
|
|
|
|
<small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 03:22, 6 June 2014</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Deleted Imageworks sub-section == |
|
== Deleted Imageworks sub-section == |
Greetings Wikipedians. I deleted the list of bullet points headed "ImageWorks" because it seems totally out of place in the Overview section. There was no context given to explain what ImageWorks is, nor its relationship to Comcast. And I can't think of any reason why those bullet points might belong there, or in this article at all for that matter. And so, being ever-mindful of Misplaced Pages's guidance to "be bold", I have taken action. If that was wrong, please tell us why. Cordially, BuzzWeiser196 (talk) 13:31, 27 December 2021 (UTC)