Revision as of 06:32, 23 April 2022 edit2001:1530:1018:fb57:8400:ae90:c29c:7124 (talk) →Kodeiin: new sectionTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:33, 24 April 2022 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,304,639 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Codeine/Archive 1) (botNext edit → | ||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
That, alas, is true for quite a few "references" on medical a/or 'recreational' drugs... -a form or error propagation typical for the digital age. | That, alas, is true for quite a few "references" on medical a/or 'recreational' drugs... -a form or error propagation typical for the digital age. | ||
Also: "Evidence does not support its use for acute cough suppression in children or adults. In Europe, it is not recommended as a cough medicine in those under 12 years of age. Some tentative evidence shows it can reduce a chronic cough in adults." can only be regarded as spurious at best, resp. methodologically questionable. - As _anyone_ who has suffered from a severe cough and thus been administered codeine will readily confirm . <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 21:07, 30 November 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | Also: "Evidence does not support its use for acute cough suppression in children or adults. In Europe, it is not recommended as a cough medicine in those under 12 years of age. Some tentative evidence shows it can reduce a chronic cough in adults." can only be regarded as spurious at best, resp. methodologically questionable. - As _anyone_ who has suffered from a severe cough and thus been administered codeine will readily confirm . <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 21:07, 30 November 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ||
==Missing Antecedent== | |||
Under pharmacokinetics it reads: "Srinivasan, Wielbo and Tebbett speculate that codeine-6-glucuronide is responsible for a large percentage of the analgesia of codeine, and, thus, these patients should experience some analgesia." But there is no reference to patients anywhere in the preceding paragraph. Who are these patients? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 15:06, 19 July 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
== Prescription drug driving impairment and legal penalties. == | == Prescription drug driving impairment and legal penalties. == | ||
Laws have recently been introduced in this area in the UK. There is no information on the subject in this article about this anywhere in the world. Should the ignorance of the possibility of driving impairment due to 'normal' use of prescription codeine and the possible legal penalties be included in this article? This is complicated by the fact the the UK legal limit is in metabolised opium per litre of blood, which will vary due to genetic differences. | Laws have recently been introduced in this area in the UK. There is no information on the subject in this article about this anywhere in the world. Should the ignorance of the possibility of driving impairment due to 'normal' use of prescription codeine and the possible legal penalties be included in this article? This is complicated by the fact the the UK legal limit is in metabolised opium per litre of blood, which will vary due to genetic differences. | ||
== External links modified == | |||
Hello fellow Wikipedians, | |||
I have just modified 2 external links on ]. Please take a moment to review . If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes: | |||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20030729104518/http://www.elmhurst.edu/~chm/vchembook/674narcotic.html to http://www.elmhurst.edu/~chm/vchembook/674narcotic.html | |||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121016064430/http://www.legislation.gov.hk/eng/home.htm to http://www.legislation.gov.hk/eng/home.htm | |||
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. | |||
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}} | |||
Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 04:59, 10 August 2017 (UTC) | |||
== ±? == | == ±? == |
Revision as of 02:33, 24 April 2022
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Codeine article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months |
Ideal sources for Misplaced Pages's health content are defined in the guideline Misplaced Pages:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Codeine.
|
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Archives | |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Non-existent reference
As far as I can tell, "The December 2008 issue of The Bulletin of the National Codeine OTC Lobby (Vol. XVIII, No. 4)" is a false reference - this organization does not seem to actually exist beyond Misplaced Pages and other websites that only seem to copy/paste what is in this paragraph regarding OTC access to Codeine. I've had a professional literature search done and come back with absolutely nothing.
That, alas, is true for quite a few "references" on medical a/or 'recreational' drugs... -a form or error propagation typical for the digital age. Also: "Evidence does not support its use for acute cough suppression in children or adults. In Europe, it is not recommended as a cough medicine in those under 12 years of age. Some tentative evidence shows it can reduce a chronic cough in adults." can only be regarded as spurious at best, resp. methodologically questionable. - As _anyone_ who has suffered from a severe cough and thus been administered codeine will readily confirm . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.63.140.105 (talk) 21:07, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
Prescription drug driving impairment and legal penalties.
Laws have recently been introduced in this area in the UK. There is no information on the subject in this article about this anywhere in the world. Should the ignorance of the possibility of driving impairment due to 'normal' use of prescription codeine and the possible legal penalties be included in this article? This is complicated by the fact the the UK legal limit is in metabolised opium per litre of blood, which will vary due to genetic differences.
±?
What does including such mixtures as aspirin + paracetamol + codeine ± caffeine ± antihistamines and other agents
mean? How can you have negative caffeine or antihistamines? If this is a medical notation, is there a less WP:JARGONy way to say this? --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 00:57, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
Kodeiin
Kodeiin on hea ravim olin sõltuvuses sellest neelasin päevast päeva peo täite kaupa neid tablette . 2001:1530:1018:FB57:8400:AE90:C29C:7124 (talk) 06:32, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
Categories: